There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
The one state/two state debate is irrelevant as Israel and the US consolidate Greater Israel.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The debate about the one-state or two-state solution is inconsequential as Israel and the US work towards a larger objective.
Noam Chomsky emphasizes that the traditional debate over whether to establish a one-state or two-state solution in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is moot given the ongoing efforts by Israel and the United States to expand their influence and territory, which is perceived as an intention to create 'Greater Israel'. This suggests that the focus should shift from the debate to the actual geopolitical strategies at play, which may undermine the possibility of a fair resolution to the conflict.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion on Middle Eastern politics, highlighting the futility of the one-state/two-state debate.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes βThe 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
Unlimited power is apt to corrupt the minds of those who posses it; and this I know, my lords: that where law ends, tyranny begins.
Today's average American is more apt to rebel against a tennis shoe not coming in the right color than against the slow erosion of our democratic freedom.
Economic libertarians and Christian evangelicals, united by their common enemy, are strange bedfellows in today's Republican party, just as the two Georges - the archconservative Wallace and the uberliberal McGovern - found themselves in the same Democratic Party in 1972.
The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism.
In the absence of sound oversight,responsible businesses are forced to compete against unscrupulous and underhanded businesses, who are unencumbered by any restrictions on activities that might harm the environment, or take advantage of middle-class families, or threaten to bring down the entire financial system.
Our American friends offer us money, arms, and advice. We take the money, we take the arms, and we decline the advice.