Indians today are governed by two different ideologies. Their political ideal set in the preamble of the Constitution affirms a life of liberty, equality and fraternity. Their social ideal embodied in their religion denies them.
B. R. AmbedkarRead
There is one taboo against meat-eating. It divides Hindus into vegetarians and flesh eaters. There is another taboo which is against beef eating. It divides Hindus into those who eat cow's flesh and those who do not.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the divisions within Hindu society based on dietary choices, particularly concerning meat and beef consumption.
B. R. Ambedkar's quote sheds light on the cultural and social divides that arise from dietary practices within Hinduism. It illustrates how these taboos on meat-eating separate individuals into distinct groups, creating a sense of identity and belonging, while also leading to potential conflict and discrimination among those who choose different dietary paths.
In practice
Discussing dietary habits in a cultural studies class.
Indians today are governed by two different ideologies. Their political ideal set in the preamble of the Constitution affirms a life of liberty, equality and fraternity. Their social ideal embodied in their religion denies them.
Political tyranny is nothing compared to the social tyranny and a reformer who defies society is a more courageous man than a politician who defies Government.
I like the religion that teaches liberty, equality and fraternity.
Democracy is not merely a form of government. It is primarily a mode of associated living, of conjoint communicated experience. It is essentially an attitude of respect and reverence towards fellow men.
So long as you do not achieve social liberty, whatever freedom is provided by the law is of no avail to you.
Law and Order are the medicine of the body politic and when the body politic gets sick, medicine must be administered.
And the Devil did grin, for his darling sin is pride that apes humility.
As I go clowning my sentimental way into eternity, wrestling with all my problems of estrangement and communion, sincerity and simulation, ambition and acquiescence, I shuttle between worrying whether I matter at all and whether anything else matters but me.
Those who choose not to empathize enable real monsters, for without ever committing an act of outright evil ourselves we collude with it through our apathy.
Human progress planned as alternatives (to God's plan) introduce in justice, evil and violence rising against the divine plan of justice and salvation. And despite transitory and apparent successes, they are reduced to simple machinations destined to dissolution and failure.
My friend Adele describes fundamentalism as holding so tightly to your beliefs that your fingernails leave imprints on the palm of your hand... I think she's right. I was a fundamentalist not because of the beliefs I held but because of how I held them: with a death grip. It would take God himself to finally pry them out of my hands. (p.17-18)
I therefore beg leave to move that henceforth prayers imploring the assistance of Heaven, and its blessing on our deliberations, be held in this Assembly every morning.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.