Painting is the making of an analogy for something non-visual and incomprehensible - giving it form and bringing it within reach. And that is why good paintings are incomprehensible. Creating the incomprehensible has absolutely nothing to do with turning out any old bunkum, because bunkum is always comprehensible.
Interpretation
This quote emphasizes that painting conveys complex, often abstract ideas that go beyond mere visuals.
Gerhard Richter's quote speaks to the essence of painting as an art form that aims to express deeper and often abstract concepts that cannot be easily visualized or understood. He suggests that the true value of a good painting lies in its ability to grapple with the incomprehensible, thus elevating it above simplistic or shallow works, which may be easy to interpret but lack depth. The complexity inherent in art challenges viewers to engage with ideas and emotions that transcend literal representation.
In practice
During an art critique, this quote can illustrate the importance of depth in artistic expression.
Form is all we have to help us cope with fundamentally chaotic facts and assaults. Formulating something is a great start. I trust form, trust my feeling or capacity to find the right form for something. Even if that is only by being well organized. That too is form.
Painting is another form of thinking.
My landscapes are not only beautiful, or nostalgic, with a Romantic or classical suggestion of lost Paradises, but above all 'untruthful.' By 'untruthful,' I mean the glorifying way we look at Nature. Nature, which in all its forms is always against us, because it knows no meaning, no pity, no sympathy, because it knows nothing and is absolutely mindless, the total antithesis of ourselves.
I like everything that has no style: dictionaries, photographs, nature, myself and my paintings. (Because style is violent, and I am not violent.)
To talk about paintings is not only difficult but perhaps pointless too. You can only express in words what words are capable of expressing-- what language can communicate. Painting has nothing to do with that.
Almost every work of art is an analogy. When I make a representation of something, this too is an analogy to what exists; I make an effort to get a grip on the thing by depicting it. I prefer to steer clear of anything aesthetic, so as not to set obstacles in my own way and not to have the problem of people saying: 'Ah, yes, that's how he sees the world, that's his interpretation.'
Composers and musicians have always starved and, as this is a sentimental country, we think the tradition should be continued.
All of a sudden there's a song - there in your hotel room playing your guitar - and you write it, and two or three years later it will come true. It keeps you on your toes.
When you do one more 'Cinderella' or whatever, what is there to learn? Every part in the repertoire has a good side and a bad side, and the more often you do the same ballet, the more often the bad side comes out. If you want to give dance life, you must give it fresh food, not keep going back to the garbage to look for old scraps.
An artist cannot get along without a public; and when the public is absent, what does he do? He invents it, and turning his back on his age, he looks toward the future for what the present denies.
The material of literary talent is words; the material of story talent is life itself.
There are elements of me in the roles I've played in the past. But people forget that Mary Poppins was just a role, too.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.