Space or science fiction has become a dialect for our time.
Doris LessingRead
People think if you have deciphered the genome of humans that you can change everything. But you cannot change everything, because you do not know what the genes mean, and you have no methods for changing them, and you can't do experiments with humans like you can with animals.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Understanding the human genome does not equate to controlling or altering it completely due to the complexity of genetic functions and ethical constraints.
Christiane Nusslein-Volhard highlights the limitations of genomic research by illustrating that while decoding the human genome may seem like a powerful tool for change, true comprehension of genetic implications and ethical experimentation is far more complex. The quote underscores the distinction between mere knowledge and the practical ability to manipulate that knowledge within ethical boundaries, especially when it comes to human subjects.
Themes
GenomeEthicsGeneticsScienceHumanExperimentation
In practice
Example use cases
During a lecture on genetic engineering, this quote can illustrate the ethical dilemmas scientists face.
Similar quotes
What really matters for me is ... the more active role of the observer in quantum physics ... According to quantum physics the observer has indeed a new relation to the physical events around him in comparison with the classical observer, who is merely a spectator.
Wolfgang PauliRead
Every living being is also a fossil. Within it, all the way down to the microscopic structure of its proteins, it bears the traces if not the stigmata of its ancestry.
Jacques MonodRead
We will first understand how simple the universe is when we recognize how strange it is.
John Archibald WheelerRead
Why is there space rather than no space? Why is space three-dimensional? Why is space big? We have a lot of room to move around in. How come it's not tiny? We have no consensus about these things. We're still exploring them.
Leonard SusskindRead
My practise as a scientist is atheistic. That is to say, when I set up an experiment I assume that no god, angel, or devil is going to interfere with its course; and this assumption has been justified by such success as I have achieved in my professional career. I should therefore be intellectually dishonest if I were not also atheistic in the affairs of the world. And I should be a coward if I did not state my theoretical views in public.
John B. S. HaldaneRead