Progress is possible only if we train ourselves to think about programs without thinking of them as pieces of executable code.
Edsger DijkstraRead
How do we convince people that in programming simplicity and clarity - in short: what mathematicians call elegance - are not a dispensable luxury, but a crucial matter that decides between success and failure?
Interpretation
Simplicity and clarity in programming are essential for success, not just optional qualities.
In this quote, Edsger Dijkstra emphasizes the importance of elegance in programming. He argues that simplicity and clarity should not be viewed as luxuries but as necessities that significantly influence whether a programming endeavor will succeed or fail. The idea is that the way code is written can have a profound impact on the outcome of a project, making it crucial for programmers to focus on these qualities.
In practice
In a programming seminar discussing best practices, one might say this quote to emphasize the importance of writing clear and simple code.
Progress is possible only if we train ourselves to think about programs without thinking of them as pieces of executable code.
Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability.
The purpose of abstraction is not to be vague, but to create a new semantic level in which one can be absolutely precise.
We shall do a much better programming job, provided that we approach the task with a full appreciation of its tremendous difficulty, provided that we stick to modest and elegant programming languages, provided that we respect the intrinsic limitations of the human mind and approach the task as Very Humble Programmers.
The tools we use have a profound and devious influence on our thinking habits, and therefore on our thinking abilities.
LISP has jokingly been described as "the most intelligent way to misuse a computer." I think that description is a great compliment because it transmits the full flavour of liberation: it has assisted a number of our most gifted fellow humans in thinking previously impossible thoughts.
We want to galvanize people's imaginations. With enough political will and investment, we could make wheelchairs obsolete.
It would appear that we have reached the limits of what it is possible to achieve with computer technology, although one should be careful with such statements, as they tend to sound pretty silly in 5 years.
It's technology married with liberal arts, married with the humanities, that yields us the results that make our heart sing.
At one point in time, you had to choose, 'Do you want to do consumer or enterprise?' But the reality today is a bit different: Enterprises are a collection of consumers.
The problem with the Internet is that it gives you everything - reliable material and crazy material. So the problem becomes, how do you discriminate?
C is quirky, flawed, and an enormous success.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.