We are now heading down a centuries-long path toward increasing the productivity of our natural capital - the resource systems upon which we depend to live - instead of our human capital.
When asked if I am pessimistic or optimistic about the future, my answer is always the same: If you look at the science about what is happening on Earth and aren't pessimistic, you don't understand the data.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote emphasizes the importance of understanding scientific data to form a realistic view of the future, suggesting that optimism without awareness of current challenges is misguided.
Paul Hawken's quote reflects both a call to realism and an acknowledgment of the serious challenges facing our planet. It suggests that one must analyze the scientific evidence regarding environmental and social issues to grasp the gravity of the situation. While optimism without informed understanding can lead to complacency, awareness of the data reveals the complexities and urgent realities we face, prompting the necessity for change and action.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be shared in discussions about climate change awareness events.
More from Paul Hawken
All quotes βInspiration is not garnered from the litanies of what may befall us; it resides in humanity's willingness to restore, redress, reform, rebuild, recover, reimagine, and reconsider.
We can no longer prosper by increasing human productivity. The more we try to do, the more poverty we will create.
At present we are stealing the future, selling it in the present, and calling it gross domestic product.
How much harm does a company have to do before we question its right to exist?
We have the capacity to create a remarkably different economy: one that can restore ecosystems and protect the environment while bringing forth innovation, prosperity, meaningful work, and true security.
Similar quotes
We have such a terrible, terrible misconception of science. We think it involves the definite, the precise, the known; it is a horrid series of gates to an unknown as vast of the universe; which means endless.
Still, it is an error to argue in front of your data. You find yourself insensibly twisting them round to fit your theories.
I think the reason people are dealing with science less well now than 50 years ago is that it has become so complicated.
Receiving the National Medal of Science is the thrill of a lifetime, but good science does not happen in isolation.
It is true that some off-label drug use is based on very unsettled science and has more risks. But medicine - and not just cancer care - involves lots of hard choices. And the more serious the disorder, often the more likely it is that for every right and wrong treatment choice there are many other practical decisions painted in shades of gray.
Astronauts will remain the explorers, the pioneers-the first to go back to moon and on to Mars. But I think it's really important to make space space available to as many people as we can. It's going to be a while before we can launch people for less than $20 million a ticket. But that day is coming.