We are now heading down a centuries-long path toward increasing the productivity of our natural capital - the resource systems upon which we depend to live - instead of our human capital.
When asked if I am pessimistic or optimistic about the future, my answer is always the same: If you look at the science about what is happening on Earth and aren't pessimistic, you don't understand the data.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote emphasizes the importance of understanding scientific data to form a realistic view of the future, suggesting that optimism without awareness of current challenges is misguided.
Paul Hawken's quote reflects both a call to realism and an acknowledgment of the serious challenges facing our planet. It suggests that one must analyze the scientific evidence regarding environmental and social issues to grasp the gravity of the situation. While optimism without informed understanding can lead to complacency, awareness of the data reveals the complexities and urgent realities we face, prompting the necessity for change and action.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be shared in discussions about climate change awareness events.
More from Paul Hawken
All quotes βInspiration is not garnered from the litanies of what may befall us; it resides in humanity's willingness to restore, redress, reform, rebuild, recover, reimagine, and reconsider.
We can no longer prosper by increasing human productivity. The more we try to do, the more poverty we will create.
At present we are stealing the future, selling it in the present, and calling it gross domestic product.
How much harm does a company have to do before we question its right to exist?
We have the capacity to create a remarkably different economy: one that can restore ecosystems and protect the environment while bringing forth innovation, prosperity, meaningful work, and true security.
Similar quotes
Science, as everyone knows, is responsible, moderate, unsentimental, and otherwise good.
As climate change moves from a model of the future to the reality of the present, health care systems across the country are facing a difficult set of questions. What are doctors supposed to do when wildfires, rising floodwater or other natural disasters threaten their ability to provide care for patients?
Politicians, real-estate agents, used-car salesmen, and advertising copy-writers are expected to stretch facts in self-serving directions, but scientists who falsify their results are regarded by their peers as committing an inexcusable crime. Yet the sad fact is that the history of science swarms with cases of outright fakery and instances of scientists who unconsciously distorted their work by seeing it through lenses of passionately held beliefs.
If penicillin had been judged by its toxicity to guinea pigs, it might never have been used by man.
People look down on stuff like geography and meteorology, and not only because they're standing on one and being soaked by the other. They don't look quite like real science. But geography is only physics slowed down and with a few trees stuck on it, and meteorology is full of excitingly fashionable chaos and complexity. And summer isn't a time. It's a place as well. Summer is a moving creature and likes to go south for the winter.
The existence of nuclear weapons presents a clear and present danger to life on Earth.