When Rush Limbaugh says I'm not a scientist, I'm charmed - I smirk.
Bill NyeRead
You stop planetary exploration, those people who do that extraordinary work are going to have to go do something else.
Interpretation
Halting planetary exploration can lead to a loss of talented individuals in the field.
Bill Nye emphasizes the importance of planetary exploration not only for scientific discovery but also for the retention of skilled professionals in the field. When such exploration is stopped, the innovative minds who contribute to it may be forced to pursue other careers, potentially leading to a decline in progress and knowledge in space science.
In practice
In a speech about the future of our space programs.
When Rush Limbaugh says I'm not a scientist, I'm charmed - I smirk.
Everybody who's a physician, who makes vaccines, who wants to find the cure for cancer. Everybody who wants to do any medical good for humankind got the passion for that before he or she was 10.
What makes the United States great, the reason people wanted to live in the United States, move here still, is because of our ability to innovate.
NASA is an engine of innovation and inspiration as well as the world's premier space exploration agency, and we are well served by politicians working to keep it that way, instead of turning it into a mere jobs program, or worse, cutting its budget.
Television isn't inherently good or bad. You go to a bookstore, there are how many thousands of books, but how many of those do you want? Five? Television's the same way. If you're going to show people stuff, television is the way to go. Words and pictures show things.
If the Earth gets hit by an asteroid, it's game over. It's control-alt-delete for civilization.
If we are to define science, ... it does not consist so much in knowing, nor even in "organized knowledge," as it does in diligent inquiry into truth for truth's sake, without any sort of axe to grind, nor for the sake of the delight of contemplating it, but from an impulse to penetrate into the reason of things.
All exact science is dominated by the idea of approximation.
If two scientists are giving their papers at a symposium, and one of them is just naturally better at talking to the public or talking to a group of people, that scientist is liable to get more attention - in fact, I'm told that they do get more attention - than the one who's a little more stiff about it. Well, that's not good for science.
I think chemistry is being frittered away by the hairsplitting of the organic chemists; we have new compounds discovered, which scarcely differ from the known ones and when discovered are valueless-very illustrations perhaps of their refinements in analysis, but very little aiding the progress of true science.
When you start in science, you are brainwashed into believing how careful you must be, and how difficult it is to discover things. There's something that might be called the 'graduate student syndrome'; graduate students hardly believe they can make a discovery.
If anyone should doubt whether the electrical matter passes through the substance of bodies, or only over along their surfaces, a shock from an electrified large glass jar, taken through his own body, will probably convince him.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.