I find that people want aggressive policing if they as a community feel they are part of it. They don't want aggressive policing if they feel it's being imposed upon them and they are a target.
Loretta LynchRead
The power to arrest - to deprive a citizen of liberty - must be used fairly, responsibly, and without bias.
Interpretation
Authority must apply law fairly and without prejudice.
Loretta Lynch emphasizes the critical importance of fairness and responsibility in the exercise of power, particularly in law enforcement. The quote highlights that the ability to restrict an individual's freedom should not be misused or influenced by personal biases, underscoring the need for integrity in those who hold such power in society.
In practice
During a speech on law enforcement reforms, one might reference this quote to emphasize the need for unbiased policing.
I find that people want aggressive policing if they as a community feel they are part of it. They don't want aggressive policing if they feel it's being imposed upon them and they are a target.
What we must not do - what we must never do - is turn on our neighbors, our family members, our fellow Americans, for something they cannot control, and deny what makes them human.
Almost one in three Americans has had some contact with the criminal justice system. When you reach that saturation point, people begin to understand, in a very visceral way, the difficulties of reentry.
Often, we do not know where our choices will take us. This is why the best choices are often made based not on what they can bring to us, but what they will allow us to bring to others.
What I have realized is I cannot guarantee the absence of discrimination or hatred or prejudice, but I can guarantee the presence of justice.
Whether it is tribalism, racism, xenophobia, or anti-Muslim backlash we're talking about, we spend so much time and energy fighting ways to divide ourselves from others.
Justice is not cheap. Justice is not quick. It is not ever finally achieved.
I am deeply impressed with the gravity and wisdom with which most federal judges approach the responsibility of sentencing. It is a difficult, soul-searching task at best.
Money will determine whether the accused goes to prison or walks out of the courtroom a free man.
Rule-following, legal precedence, and political consistency are not more important than right, justice and plain common-sense.
Crime takes place in every country. But it becomes abuse when the state is unwilling and unable to protect the life and honour of its citizens.
But I really think it's a very unfortunate part of our judicial system and I would feel much, much better if more states would really consider whether they think the benefits outweigh the very serious potential injustice, because in these cases the emotions are very, very high on both sides and to have stakes as high as you do in these cases, there is a special potential for error. We cannot ignore the fact that in recent years a disturbing number of inmates on death row have been exonerated.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.