What Asia's postwar economic miracle demonstrates is that_x000D_ capitalism is a path toward economic development that is potentially_x000D_ available to all countries. No underdeveloped country in the_x000D_ Third World is disadvantaged simply because it began the growth_x000D_ process later than Europe, nor are the established industrial powers_x000D_ capable of blocking the development of a latecomer, provided_x000D_ that country plays by the rules of economic liberalism.
That's the problem with very high taxes - they don't redistribute wealth; they redistribute people.
Interpretation
What this quote means
High taxes can drive people away rather than effectively redistributing wealth.
This quote highlights a critical perspective on the impact of high taxation on society. It suggests that rather than achieving a more equitable distribution of wealth, excessive taxes can lead to individuals relocating to places with lower taxes, thereby undermining the intended goals of wealth redistribution and potentially harming local economies. The implication is that high taxes may be counterproductive, as they do not bring about the social change desired by their proponents, but rather result in a loss of human capital and economic vitality.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a speech on fiscal policy, one might use this quote to illustrate the unintended consequences of high taxation.
Similar quotes
When a nation is over-reliant on one or two commodities like oil or precious minerals, corrupt government ministers and their dodgy associates hoard profits and taxes instead of properly allocating them to schools and hospitals.
The collapse of the world's banking system and the impending disaster of accelerating climate change are not separate phenomena. They are simply the most visible symptoms of a particular model of capitalism that will bring civilisation to its knees. But those symptoms will not get sorted unless and until we commit to a radical transformation of the way we create and distribute wealth in the world today
The first requisite of a sound monetary system is that it put the least possible power over the quantity or quality of money in the hands of the politicians.
The public firm can nowhere maintain itself in free competition with the private firm; it is possible today only where it has a monopoly that excludes competition. Even that alone is evidence of its lesser economic productivity.
If a financial institution has business operations in the United States, hires people in the United States, if they are clogged with illiquid assets, they have the same impact on the American people as any other institution.