Revenge is sweeter than life itself. So think fools.
JuvenalRead
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? - Who will watch the watchers?
Interpretation
This quote questions the accountability of those in power and who oversees them.
The quote 'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?' translates to 'Who will watch the watchers?' and raises a fundamental philosophical concern regarding authority and governance. It suggests that those who hold power or authority must also be supervised to prevent corruption and misuse of that power, emphasizing the need for accountability in leadership roles.
In practice
In a discussion about political reforms, one might say, 'Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?' to emphasize the need for checks on those in power.
Revenge is sweeter than life itself. So think fools.
Peace visits not the guilty mind.
An incurable itch for scribbling takes possession of many, and grows inveterate in their insane breasts.
Poverty is bitter, but it has no harder pang than that it makes men ridiculous.
All wish to possess knowledge, but few, comparatively speaking, are willing to pay the price.
This is his first punishment, that by the verdict of his own heart no guilty man is acquitted.
There are people who observe the rules of honor as one observes the stars, from a great distance.
They all attended Hester's church, which Dellarobia viewed as a complicated pyramid scheme of moral debt and credit resting ultimately on the shoulders of the Lord, but rife with middle managers.
The very idea of freedom presupposes some objective moral law which overarches rulers and ruled alike...Unless we return to the crude and nursery-like belief in objective values, we perish.
The fact that so many people choose to live in ways that narrow the community of fate to a very limited set of others and to define the rest as threatening to their way of life and values is deeply worrying because this contemporary form of tribalism, and the ideologies that support it, enable them to deny complex and more crosscutting mutual interdependencies-local, national, and international-and to elude their own role in creating long-term threats to their own wellbeing and that of others.
A minority is only thought of as a minority when it constitutes some kind of threat to the majority, real or imaginary. And no threat is ever quite imaginary.
We need a better way to talk about eating animals, a way that doesn't ignore, or even just shruggingly accept things like habits, cravings, family and history, but rather incorporates them into the conversation. The more they are allowed in, the more strongly we will want to follow our best instincts.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.