The critical point is that the Constitution places the right of silence beyond the reach of government.
William O. DouglasRead
We are rapidly entering the age of no privacy, where everyone is open to surveillance at all times; where there are no secrets from government.
Interpretation
This quote highlights the diminishing boundaries of personal privacy in a surveillance-driven society.
William O. Douglas's quote warns about the increasing encroachment of surveillance in our lives, suggesting that we are moving into an era where privacy is nearly non-existent. The observation addresses concerns over government transparency and the ease with which personal information can be accessed, effectively arguing that this loss of secrecy may lead to significant implications for individual freedom and autonomy.
In practice
In a discussion about data protection rights during a technology conference.
The critical point is that the Constitution places the right of silence beyond the reach of government.
One who comes to the Court must come to adore, not to protest. That's the new gloss on the First Amendment.
The great and invigorating influences in American life have been the unorthodox: the people who challenge an existing institution or way of life, or say and do things that make people think.
I have the same confidence in the ability of our people to reject noxious literature as I have in their capacity to sort out the true from the false in theology, economics, or any other field.
Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us.
The truth is that a vast restructuring of our society is needed if remedies are to become available to the average person. Without that restructuring the good will that holds society together will be slowly dissipated... It is that sense of futility which permeates the present series of protests and dissents. Where there is a persistent sense of futility, there is violence; and that is where we are today.
We might possess every technological resource... but if our language is inadequate, our vision remains formless, our thinking and feeling are still running in the old cycles, our process may be 'revolutionary' but not transformative.
I don't know whether computers are improving the style of play, I know they are changing it. Chess has become a different game, one could say that computers have changed the world of chess. That is pretty clear.
It is deeply against my principles to work on any project that I think is to weaponize AI.
Government isn't that good at rapid advancement of technology. It tends to be better at funding basic research. To have things take off, you've got to have commercial companies do it.
There will come a time when it isn't 'They're spying on me through my phone' anymore. Eventually, it will be 'My phone is spying on me'.
I think that in an Internet age, content is content. As long as you can stand up on the merits of what you're doing right at that moment and aren't just relying on your success in doing something else, it's all good; people will respect you.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.