Why should ANYTHING go right; even observation and deduction? Why should not good logic be as misleading as bad logic? They are both movements in the brain of a bewildered ape?
Interpretation
The quote questions the reliability of human reasoning and logic, suggesting it's equally flawed as it can be insightful.
Gilbert K. Chesterton's quote challenges the assumption that our logical processes and observations lead us to truth. He implies that both correct and incorrect reasoning stem from the same human condition, highlighting the potential for error in our understanding and the bewilderment of human existence. This reflection on the nature of human cognition suggests that we may give too much credit to our reasoning abilities, which can often lead us astray just as easily as faulty reasoning.
In practice
In a debate about science versus faith, this quote can be used to highlight the complexities of reasoning.
Tradition does not mean a dead town; it does not mean that the living are dead but that the dead are alive. It means that it still matters what Penn did two hundred years ago or what Franklin did a hundred years ago; I never could feel in New York that it mattered what anybody did an hour ago.
I owe my success to having listened respectfully to the very best advice, and then going away and doing the exact opposite.
The good Bishop of Assisi expressed a sort of horror at the hard life which the Little Brothers lived at the Portiuncula, without comforts, without possessions, eating anything they could get and sleeping anyhow on the ground. St. Francis answered him with that curious and almost stunning shrewdness which the unworldly can sometimes wield like a club of stone. He said, 'If we had any possessions, we should need weapons and laws to defend them.
The ordinary scientific man is strictly a sentimentalist. He is a sentimentalist in this essential sense, that he is soaked and swept away by mere associations.
I suppose every one must have reflected how primeval and how poetical are the things that one carries in one's pocket; the pocket-knife, for instance, the type of all human tools, the infant of the sword. Once I planned to write a book of poems entirely about things in my pockets. But I found it would be too long; and the age of the great epics is past.
Madness does not come by breaking out, but by giving in; by settling down in some dirty, little, self-repeating circle of ideas; by being tamed.
Will minus intellect constitutes vulgarity.
Let us not be blind to our differences-but let us also direct attention to our common interests and to the means by which those differences can be resolved. And if we cannot end our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for diversity. For, in the final analysis, our most common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's future. And we are all mortal.
Savages we call them because their manners differ from ours.
There should be a balance between material and spiritual progress, a balance achieved through the principles based on love and compassion.
Nothing could be more reckless than to base one's moral philosophy on the latest pronouncements of science.
I think that we all know what evil is. We have a sense of what's evil, and certainly killing innocent people is evil. We're less sure about what is good. There's sort of good, good enough, could be better - but absolute good is a little harder to define.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.