The role of radiologists will evolve from doing perceptual things that could probably be done by a highly trained pigeon to doing far more cognitive things.
Interpretation
Radiologists will shift from basic perceptual tasks to more complex cognitive responsibilities.
Geoffrey Hinton suggests that the future of radiology involves a transition from routine visual analyses, which could be delegated to simple systems, to tasks that require advanced cognitive skills, critical thinking, and decision-making. This evolution highlights the growing importance of human expertise in fields increasingly supported by technology.
In practice
In a speech about the future of healthcare technology at a conference.
Everybody right now, they look at the current technology, and they think, 'OK, that's what artificial neural nets are.' And they don't realize how arbitrary it is. We just made it up! And there's no reason why we shouldn't make up something else.
In the long run, curiosity-driven research just works better... Real breakthroughs come from people focusing on what they're excited about.
In science, you can say things that seem crazy, but in the long run, they can turn out to be right. We can get really good evidence, and in the end, the community will come around.
Most people in AI, particularly the younger ones, now believe that if you want a system that has a lot of knowledge in, like an amount of knowledge that would take millions of bits to quantify, the only way to get a good system with all that knowledge in it is to make it learn it. You are not going to be able to put it in by hand.
I have always been convinced that the only way to get artificial intelligence to work is to do the computation in a way similar to the human brain. That is the goal I have been pursuing. We are making progress, though we still have lots to learn about how the brain actually works.
In a sensibly organised society, if you improve productivity, there is room for everybody to benefit.
Therefore in medicine we ought to know the causes of sickness and health.
It was one time when people thought the value of the fine structure constant was important. Now of course it's still important, of course, as a practical matter,but we now know that the value it has is a function, that in any fundamental theory you derive the fine structure constant as a function of all sorts of mass ratios and so on and it's not really that fundamental.
Humans are natural-born scientists. When we're born, we want to know why the stars shine. We want to know why the sun rises.
We live inside our universe and cannot get a bird's-eye view of it from outside. And we cannot even see all of our universe. Distant parts of it are expanding away from us so fast that they are invisible; they go faster than the speed of light. Having bigger telescopes to see fainter stars will not help us here: invisible is truly invisible.
One aim of physical sciences had been to give an exact picture the material world. One achievement of physics in the twentieth century has been to prove that that aim is unattainable.
We have to understand the ubiquity of energy in everything we do. Energy is core to our economy and it brings with it environmental challenges, and it's core to our security challenges.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.