QuoteProject
Science is a beautiful gift to humanity; we should not distort it.
A. P. J. Abdul Kalam
ShareWTF𝕏

Interpretation

What this quote means

Science should be appreciated and respected for its contributions to humanity.

This quote highlights the importance of science as a valuable gift to society, emphasizing that we must not misrepresent or misuse it. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam advocates for the integrity of scientific knowledge and encourages a responsible approach in applying scientific discoveries for the betterment of humanity.

Themes

ScienceHumanityIntegrityKnowledgeRespect

In practice

Example use cases

During a speech at a university graduation, one could say this quote to inspire future scientists.

More from A. P. J. Abdul Kalam

For success of any mission, it is necessary to have creative leadership. Creative leadership is vital for government, non-governmental organisations as well as for industries.
A. P. J. Abdul KalamRead
Over the years, I had nurtured the hope to be able to fly; to handle a machine as it rose higher and higher in the stratosphere was my dearest dream.
A. P. J. Abdul KalamRead
It's when children are 15, 16 or 17 that they decide whether they want to be a doctor, an engineer, a politician or go to the Mars or moon. That is the time they start having a dream, and that's the time you can work on them. You can help them shape their dreams.
A. P. J. Abdul KalamRead
We must think and act like a nation of a billion people and not like that of a million people. Dream, dream, dream!
A. P. J. Abdul KalamRead
Where there is righteousness in the heart, there is harmony in the house; when there is harmony in the house, there is order in the nation; when there is order in the nation, there is peace in the world.
A. P. J. Abdul KalamRead
My 2020 Vision for India is to transform it into a developed nation. That cannot be abstract; it is a lifeline.
A. P. J. Abdul KalamRead

Similar quotes

What do you think science is? There is nothing magical about science. It is simply a systematic way for carefully and thoroughly observing nature and using consistent logic to evaluate results. So which part of that exactly do you disagree with? Do you disagree with being thorough? Using careful observation? Being systematic? Or using consistent logic?
Steven NovellaRead
It took them only an instant to cut of that head, but it is unlikely that a hundred years will suffice to reproduce a singular one.
Antoine LavoisierRead
Science can lift people out of poverty and cure disease. That, in turn, will reduce civil unrest.
Stephen HawkingRead
What is mathematics? It is only a systematic effort of solving puzzles posed by nature.
Shakuntala DeviRead
The mathematical facts worthy of being studied are those which, by their analogy with other facts, are capable of leading us to the knowledge of a physical law. They reveal the kinship between other facts, long known, but wrongly believed to be strangers to one another.
Henri PoincareRead
When I wrote 'Neuromancer', I had a list in my head of all the things the future was assumed to be which it would not be in the book I was about to write. In a sense, I intended 'Neuromancer', among other things, to be a critique of all the aspects of science fiction that no longer satisfied me.
William GibsonRead

A little wisdom, now and then

Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.