Certain brief sentences are peerless in their ability to give one the feeling that nothing remains to be said.
If a given scientist had not made a given discovery, someone else would have done so a little later. Johann Mendel dies unknown after having discovered the laws of heredity: thirty-five years later, three men rediscover them. But the book that is not written will never be written. The premature death of a great scientist delays humanity; that of a great writer deprives it.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Scientific discoveries are often re-discovered, but unwritten literature is lost forever.
This quote emphasizes the idea that scientific ideas, while significant, can eventually be uncovered by others, thereby ensuring the continuation of knowledge. In contrast, the death of a writer who has potential insights or stories to share results in a permanent loss to humanity, as their unique contributions will remain unwritten and unshared, highlighting the importance of creative expression alongside scientific advancement.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a seminar on the importance of scientific research, one might use this quote to illustrate the impact of individual contributions to collective knowledge.
More from Jean Rostand
All quotes →My pessimism extends to the point of even suspecting the sincerity of other pessimists.
We spend our time envying people whom we wouldn't wish to be.
Stupidity, outrage, vanity, cruelty, iniquity, bad faith, falsehood - we fail to see the whole array when it is facing in the same direction as we.
When a scientist is ahead of his times, it is often through misunderstanding of current, rather than intuition of future truth. In science there is never any error so gross that it won't one day, from some perspective, appear prophetic.
A few great minds are enough to endow humanity with monstrous power, but a few great hearts are not enough to make us worthy of using it.
Similar quotes
My whole interest is, how do you use evolution as an innovation engine? How does evolution solve new problems that life faces? And to have a system that can create a whole new chemical bond that biology hasn't done before, to me, demonstrates the power of nature to innovate.
When we seed millions of acres of land with these plants, what happens to foraging birds, to insects, to microbes, to the other animals, when they come in contact and digest plants that are producing materials ranging from plastics to vaccines to pharmaceutical products?
So far as physics is concerned, time's arrow is a property of entropy alone.
Ever since Newton, we've done science by taking things apart to see how they work. What the computer enables us to do is to put things together to see how they work: we're now synthesized rather than analysed. I find one of the most enthralling aspects of computers is limitless communication.
To learn more about science, turn off your electronic device and go outside and look around a bit. Nature is calling you. Go on. The internet will still be here.
Before we start talking about genetic differences, you gotta come up with a system where there's equal opportunity.