During the twentieth century, men fought on behalf of nationalism. Yet the wars they fought were also engendered by dislocations in world markets and by social revolution stimulated by the coming of the industrial age.
Regret what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.
Interpretation
What this quote means
The quote reflects on the strategic implications of a military operation that drew the Soviet Union into a costly conflict in Afghanistan.
Zbigniew Brzezinski discusses the rationale behind a pivotal decision during the Cold War, suggesting that the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan was a tactical maneuver that would lead to the weakening of the Soviet Union. He emphasizes that what could have been seen as an act of regret was, in fact, a calculated strategy that ultimately contributed to the Soviet empire's collapse, demonstrating how geopolitical maneuvers can have far-reaching consequences.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be used in a speech about military strategy and historical conflicts.
More from Zbigniew Brzezinski
All quotes →Constant reference to a 'war on terror' did accomplish one major objective: It stimulated the emergence of a culture of fear.
Iraq may have been a preview of that, but it's still redeemable if we get out fast. In a war with Iran, we'll get dragged down for 20 or 30 years. The world will condemn us. We will lose our position in the world.
The congressional role in declaring war is especially important not when the United States is the victim of an attack, but when the United States is planning to wage war abroad.
There may be circumstances in which damaging our relationship with countries over human rights is counterproductive and the benefits to human rights may be very small because of our limited capacity to enforce our stance. That was the dilemma the United States faced after Tiananmen Square.
War on terrorism defines the central preoccupation of the United States in the world today, and it does reflect in my view a rather narrow and extremist vision of foreign policy of the world's first superpower, of a great democracy, with genuinely idealistic traditions.
Similar quotes
We cannot run a democracy without a strong middle class.
America's present need is not heroics, but healing; not nostrums, but normalcy; not revolution, but restoration; not agitation, but adjustment; not surgery, but serenity; not the dramatic, but the dispassionate; not experiment, but equipoise; not submergence in internationality, but sustainment in triumphant nationality.
Optimism comes less easily today, not because democracy is less vigorous, but because democracy's enemies have refined their instruments of repression.
About all I can say for the United States Senate is that it opens with a prayer and closes with an investigation.
It has been observed that a pure democracy if it were practicable would be the most perfect government. Experience has proved that no position is more false than this. The ancient democracies in which the people themselves deliberated never possessed one good feature of government. Their very character was tyranny; their figure deformity.
One of the things the United States does well is building coalitions. What the U.S. knows is that if you don't have a coalition with you, you will have a coalition against you. I don't want to see China and Russia on the side of Iran more strongly than they are.