When I hear complaints about less liquidity, remember there is such a thing as too much liquidity.
Paul VolckerRead
It is a sobering fact that the prominence of central banks in this century has coincided with a general tendency towards more inflation, not less. [I]f the overriding objective is price stability, we did better with the nineteenth-century gold standard and passive central banks, with currency boards, or even with 'free banking.' The truly unique power of a central bank, after all, is the power to create money, and ultimately the power to create is the power to destroy.
Interpretation
Central banks, while powerful, have often been associated with rising inflation instead of price stability.
In this quote, Paul Volcker reflects on the historical context of central banking, suggesting that the increase in central banks' influence has paralleled rising inflation rates. He argues that a focus on price stability may have been better achieved in the past under systems like the gold standard, indicating that the ability of central banks to create money can lead to negative consequences, including inflation.
In practice
During a discussion on monetary policy, one might reference this quote to emphasize the risks associated with central bank power.
When I hear complaints about less liquidity, remember there is such a thing as too much liquidity.
The only thing useful banks have invented in 20 years is the ATM.
What's the subject of life - to get rich? All of those fellows out there getting rich could be dancing around the real subject of life.
The widely accepted assertion that, only if you let markets be will everyone be paid correctly and thus fairly, according to his worth, is a myth. Only when we part with this myth and grasp the political nature of the market and the collective nature of individual productivity will we be able to build a more just society in which historical legacies and collective actions, and not just individual talents and efforts, are properly taken into account in deciding how to reward people.
Today we have a temporary aberration called "industrial capitalism" which is inadvertently liquidating its two most important sources of capital, the natural world and properly functioning societies._x000D_ _x000D_ No sensible capitalist would do that.
Economics is a choice between alternatives all the time. Those are the trade-offs.
During the next four years...unless drastic steps are taken by Congress, the U.S. will have nearly 8,000,000 unemployed and will stand on the brink of a deep depression.
They will come to learn in the end, at their own expense, that it is better to endure competition for rich customers than to be invested with monopoly over impoverished customers.
A clear lesson of history is that a 'sine qua non' for sustained economic recovery following a financial crisis is a thoroughgoing repair of the financial system.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.