Science is a way to not fool ourselves.
Carl SaganRead
We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology, in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology.
Interpretation
Society relies heavily on science and technology, yet most people lack basic understanding of it.
In this quote, Carl Sagan points out the paradox of modern society: while we are surrounded by incredible advancements in science and technology that shape our everyday lives, a significant portion of the population remains uninformed about the very foundations that support these tools and innovations. This awareness gap can lead to a disconnect between the benefits of knowledge and the general public's understanding of its implications.
In practice
In a discussion about the importance of science education, this quote can highlight the need for greater public understanding.
Science is a way to not fool ourselves.
In more than one respect, the exploring of the Solar System and homesteading other worlds constitutes the beginning, much more than the end, of history.
How smart does a chimpanzee have to be before killing him constitutes murder?
The hole in the ozone layer is a kind of skywriting. At first it seemed to spell out our continuing complacency before a witch's brew of deadly perils. But perhaps it really tells of a newfound talent to work together to protect the global environment.
There is a reward structure in science that is very interesting: Our highest honors go to those who disprove the findings of the most revered among us. So Einstein is revered not just because he made so many fundamental contributions to science, but because he found an imperfection in the fundamental contribution of Isaac Newton.
The simplest thought, like the concept of the number one, has an elaborate logical underpinning.
Science does not aim at establishing immutable truths and eternal dogmas; its aim is to approach the truth by successive approximations, without claiming that at any stage final and complete accuracy has been achieved.
On the ordinary view of each species having been independently created, we gain no scientific explanation.
The fact remains that, if the supply of energy failed, modern civilization would come to an end as abruptly as does the music of an organ deprived of wind.
I just try to stuff my brain with everything that I can read on what is going on in science at a very high level, and sometimes I see connections of what might need to be done.
The debate's over. The people who dispute the international consensus on global warming are in the same category now with the people who think the moon landing was staged on a movie lot in Arizona.
What, then, is this blue sky, which certainly does exist, and which veils from us the stars during the day?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.