You wouldn’t be normal if you were never afraid. Even the bravest men experience fear. One of the biggest jobs we all face in combat is to overcome fear.
Joseph HellerRead
When I read something saying I've not done anything as good as 'Catch-22' I'm tempted to reply, 'Who has?'
Interpretation
The quote reflects the unique brilliance of 'Catch-22' and the author's recognition of its exceptional quality.
Joseph Heller expresses a common sentiment among authors and creators: the struggle of self-comparison against monumental works. By questioning who has achieved something as notable as 'Catch-22', he highlights the exceptional nature of his own work, while also acknowledging the pressure of external critique.
In practice
In a speech encouraging young authors, one might quote Heller to inspire confidence in their own work.
You wouldn’t be normal if you were never afraid. Even the bravest men experience fear. One of the biggest jobs we all face in combat is to overcome fear.
History did not demand Yossarian's premature demise, justice could be satisfied without it, progress did not hinge upon it, victory did not depend on it. That men would die was a matter of necessity; WHICH men would die, though, was a matter of circumstance, and Yossarian was willing to be the victim of anything but circumstance. But that was war. Just about all he could find in its favor was that it paid well and liberated children from the pernicious influence of their parents.
The enemy is anybody who's going to get you killed, no matter which side he's on.
He had decided to live forever or die in the attempt.
Hungry Joe collected lists of fatal diseases and arranged them in alphabetical order so that he could put his finger without delay on any one he wanted to worry about.
The country was in peril; he was jeopardizing his traditional rights of freedom and independence by daring to exercise them.
There are books so alive that you're always afraid that while you weren't reading, the book has gone and changed, has shifted like a river; while you went on living, it went on living too, and like a river moved on and moved away. No one has stepped twice into the same river. But did anyone ever step twice into the same book?
It’s a small story really, about, among other things: * A girl * Some words * An accordionist * Some fanatical Germans * A Jewish fist fighter * And quite a lot of thievery
THE WRITER can get free of his writing only by using it, that is, by reading oneself. As if the aim of writing were to use what is already written as a launching pad for reading the writing to come. Moreover, what he has written is read in the process, hence constantly modified by his reading. The book is an unbearable totality. I write against a background of facets.
The atmosphere of orthodoxy is always damaging to prose, and above all it is completely ruinous to the novel, the most anarchical of all forms of literature.
After I had my son I looked everywhere for a book that might serve as some kind of mirror. I bought so many silly books. Now I see what the problem was: I wanted a book about time-about mortality. I can't think of a writer who is at once so experimentally daring and so rigorously uncompromising as Sarah Manguso. Ongoingness is an incredibly elegant, wise book, and I loved it.
So many Indian novels, quite unfairly, do not get the prominence they should because they have been written in a language other than English.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.