If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.
Interpretation
The quote expresses a deep sense of wonder and admiration for the natural world as understood through science.
In this quote, Albert Einstein reflects on a profound sense of spirituality derived from the awe-inspiring complexity and beauty of the universe as revealed by scientific inquiry. He suggests that his appreciation for the natural world's structure and laws can be deemed a form of religiosity, highlighting a connection between scientific understanding and a deep emotional response to existence.
In practice
This quote can be used during a talk about the relationship between science and spirituality.
I cannot then believe in this concept of an anthropomorphic God who has the powers of interfering with these natural laws. As I said before, the most beautiful and most profound religious emotion that we can experience is the sensation of the mystical. And this mysticality is the power of all true science.
If I would follow your advice and Jesus could perceive it, he, as a Jewish teacher, surely would not approve of such behavior.
I want to know all Gods thoughts; all the rest are just details.
In the middle of adversity there is great opportunity.
I do not believe that civilization will be wiped out in a war fought with the atomic bomb. Perhaps two-thirds of the people of the earth will be killed.
To me the worst thing seems to be a school principally to work with methods of fear, force and artificial authority. Such treatment destroys the sound sentiments, the sincerity and the self-confidence of pupils and produces a subservient subject.
All exact science is dominated by the idea of approximation.
The laws of physics ... seem to be the product of exceedingly ingenious design... The universe must have a purpose.
I just felt that space was the next thing coming in aviation. It was higher, faster. It had the risk.
No one may have the guts to say this, but if we could make better human beings by knowing how to add genes, why shouldn't we?
We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct. My own feeling is that it is not crazy enough.
Do I get grief for the fact that in communicating, say, about the baboons I'm doing so much anthropomorphizing? One hopes that the parts that are blatantly ridiculous will be perceived as such. I've nonetheless been stunned by some of my more humorless colleagues - to see that they were not capable of recognizing that.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.