Although it is true that by fate all things are forced and linked by a necessary and dominant reason, nevertheless the character of our minds is subject to fate in a manner corresponding to their nature and quality.
ChrysippusRead
If something were brought about without an antecedent cause, it would be untrue that all things come about through fate. But if it is plausible that all events have an antecedent cause, what ground can be offered for not conceding that all things come about through fate?
Interpretation
The quote explores the relationship between causation and fate, suggesting that if all events have causes, then fate must be acknowledged.
Chrysippus raises an intriguing philosophical question about causation and fate. He argues that if every event originates from a preceding cause, then it follows logically that we must accept the idea of fate as a governing principle. This perspective challenges our understanding of free will and destiny, inviting us to consider how our actions are influenced by prior events and whether we can exist independently of a predetermined framework.
In practice
In a philosophy class discussing the nature of free will and determinism.
Although it is true that by fate all things are forced and linked by a necessary and dominant reason, nevertheless the character of our minds is subject to fate in a manner corresponding to their nature and quality.
Fate is a sempiternal and unchangeable series and chain of things, rolling and unraveling itself through eternal sequences of cause and effect, of which it is composed and compounded.
Wise people are in want of nothing, and yet need many things. On the other hand, nothing is needed by fools, for they do not understand how to use anything, but are in want of everything.
The game of life is a game of boomerangs. Our thoughts, deeds and words return to us sooner or later with astounding accuracy.
America needs to understand Islam, because this is the one religion that erases from its society the race problem.
A duel is just two murders who agree to take turns trying to kill each other.
There is object proof that homosexuality is more interesting than heterosexuality. It's that one knows a considerable number of heterosexuals who would wish to become homosexuals, whereas one knows very few homosexuals who would really like to become heterosexuals.
We always try to interpret things in accordance with what we want and not as they are.
Organs, faculties, powers, capacities, or whatever else we call them; grow by use and diminish from disuse, it is inferred that they will continue to do so. And if this inference is unquestionable, then is the one above deduced from it-that humanity must in the end become completely adapted to its conditions-unquestionable also. Progress, therefore, is not an accident, but a necessity.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.