Everything in nature is the result of fixed laws.
Charles DarwinRead
Why, if species have descended from other species by insensibly fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable transitional forms.
Interpretation
Darwin questions the lack of observable transitional forms if evolution occurs through gradual changes.
In this quote, Charles Darwin is reflecting on the theory of evolution, specifically addressing a potential challenge to the idea that species evolve gradually from one form to another. He points out that if this gradual change is true, one would expect to find many transitional forms in the fossil record, yet their absence raises important questions about the completeness of our understanding of evolutionary history.
In practice
In a discussion about evolutionary theory in a classroom setting.
Everything in nature is the result of fixed laws.
The highest possible stage in moral culture is when we recognize that we ought to control our thoughts.
I am quite conscious that my speculations run beyond the bounds of true science....It is a mere rag of an hypothesis with as many flaw[s] & holes as sound parts.
We cannot fathom the marvelous complexity of an organic being; but on the hypothesis here advanced this complexity is much increased. Each living creature must be looked at as a microcosm--a little universe, formed of a host of self-propagating organisms, inconceivably minute and as numerous as the stars in heaven.
I have called this principle, by which each slight variation, if useful, is preserved, by the term of Natural Selection.
we are always slow in admitting any great change of which we do not see the intermediate steps
All models are wrong, and increasingly you can succeed without them.
In a lot of scientists, the ratio of wonder to skepticism declines in time. That may be connected with the fact that in some fields-mathematics, physics, some others-the great discoveries are almost entirely made by youngsters.
It is seen that both matter and radiation possess a remarkable duality of character, as they sometimes exhibit the properties of waves, at other times those of particles. Now, it is obvious that a thing cannot be a form of wave motion and composed of particles at the same time - the two concepts are too different.
Science operates in the natural, not the supernatural. In fact, I go so far as to state that there is no such thing as the supernatural or the paranormal.
That is the logical tight-rope on which we have to walk if we wish to interpret nature.
A mind is accustomed to mathematical deduction, when confronted with the faulty foundations of astrology, resists a long, long time, like an obstinate mule, until compelled by beating and curses to put its foot into that dirty puddle.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.