It is impossible to predict the time and progress of revolution. It is governed by its own more or less mysterious laws.
While the State exists there can be no freedom; when there is freedom there will be no State.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Lenin suggests that the existence of a state inherently limits individual freedom, while true freedom would lead to the dissolution of state power.
This quote by Lenin encapsulates a fundamental idea in political philosophy about the relationship between the state and individual freedom. He argues that a governing body or state inherently imposes restrictions and control over individuals, which contradicts the essence of freedom. In a society where individuals are truly free, the need for a state ceases to exist, as people's actions and choices would not require oversight or enforcement by an external authority.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about political ideologies at a university lecture on Marxism.
More from Vladimir Lenin
All quotes βFor the complete extinction of the state, complete Communism is necessary.
Medicine is the keystone of the arch of socialism.
A democracy is a state which recognizes the subjection of the minority to the majority, that is, an organization for the systematic use of violence by one class against the other, by one part of the population against another.
We are not utopians, we do not βdreamβ of dispensing at once with all administration, with all subordination. These anarchist dreams, based upon incomprehension of the tasks of the proletarian dictatorship, are totally alien to Marxism, and, as a matter of fact, serve only to postpone the socialist revolution until people are different. No, we want the socialist revolution with people as they are now, with people who cannot dispense with subordination, control, and "foremen and accountants".
The way to crush the bourgeoisie is to grind them between the millstones of taxation and inflation.
Similar quotes
Word is murder of a thing, not only in the elementary sense of implying its absence - by naming a thing, we treat it as absent, as dead, although it is still present - but above all in the sense of its radical dissection: the word 'quarters' the thing, it tears it out of the embedment in its concrete context, it treats its component parts as entities with an autonomous existence: we speak about color, form, shape, etc., as if they possessed self-sufficient being.
The exclusion of the weak and insignificant, the seemingly useless people, from a Christian community may actually mean the exclusion of Christ; in the poor brother Christ is knocking at the door.
One as deformed and horrible as myself, could not deny herself to me. My companion must be of the same species, and have the same defects... with whom I can live in the interchange of those sympathies necessary for my being.
When people call people nerds, mostly what they're saying is, 'you like stuff.' Which is not a good insult at all, like, 'you are too enthusiastic about the miracle of human conscience.
I came with the notion of perhaps saying something for monks and to monks of all religions because I am supposed to be a monk. ... My dear brothers, WE ARE ALREADY ONE. BUT WE IMAGINE THAT WE ARE NOT. And what we have to recover is our original unity. What we have to be is what we are
I'm for democracy, but imposing democracy is an oxymoron. People have to choose democracy, and it has to come up from below.