If a poet interprets a poem of his own he limits its suggestibility.
William Butler YeatsRead
I had still the ambition, formed in Sligo in my teens, of living in imitation of Thoreau on Innisfree, a little island in Lough Gill, and when walking through Fleet Street very homesick I heard a little tinkle of water and saw a fountain in a shop window which balanced a little ball upon its jet, and began to remember lake water. From the sudden remembrance came my poem Innisfree.
Interpretation
The quote reflects the deep connection between memory, nature, and artistic inspiration.
In this quote, Yeats captures a poignant moment when a simple sight—a fountain—evokes a powerful memory of nature, leading to the creation of his poem 'Innisfree'. It highlights how personal experiences and nostalgia can fuel artistic expression, reminding us of the beauty and peace found in the natural world.
In practice
During a poetry reading, you could introduce Yeats' quote to discuss how nature influences creativity.
If a poet interprets a poem of his own he limits its suggestibility.
It was my first meeting with a philosophy that confirmed my vague speculations and seemed at once logical and boundless.
But I, being poor, have only my dreams; I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
How far away the stars seem, and how far is our first kiss, and ah, how old my heart.
For he would be thinking of love Till the stars had run away And the shadows eaten the moon.
Love is created and preserved by intellectual analysis, for we love only that which is unique, and it belongs to contemplation, not to action, for we would not change that which we love.
I don't like to make strong statements. I want to write strong novels... I keep my deep, radical things for my novels.
The trouble with music appreciation in general is that people are taught to have too much respect for music they should be taught to love it instead.
I went into photography because it seemed like the perfect vehicle for commenting on the madness of today's existence.
Now why should the cinema follow the forms of theater and painting rather than the methodology of language, which allows wholly new concepts of ideas to arise from the combination of two concrete denotations of two concrete objects?
If Charlie Parker were a Gunslinger, There'd be a Whole Lot of Dead Copycats
I write what I don't know. It's way more interesting.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.