When will Labour learn that you cannot build Jerusalem in Brussels.
There are still people in my party who believe in consensus politics. I regard them as Quislings, as traitors... I mean it.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Margaret Thatcher criticizes those in her party who seek compromise, labeling them as traitors to her ideals.
In this quote, Margaret Thatcher expresses her disdain for members of her party who advocate for consensus politics, indicating that she sees such compromises as a betrayal of core principles. She emphasizes a strong stance against any form of political negotiation that dilutes her vision, comparing those who seek consensus to Quislings, a term used to describe traitors during wartime, thereby underlining her belief in firm political loyalty and conviction.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a political debate, one might quote Thatcher to highlight the importance of unwavering party loyalty.
More from Margaret Thatcher
All quotes βNever in the history of human credit has so much been owed.
The battle for women's rights has been largely won.
Ought we not to ask the media to agree among themselves a voluntary code of conduct, under which they would not say or show anything which could assist the terrorists' morale or their cause while the hijack lasted.
Israel must never be expected to jeopardize her security: if she was ever foolish enough to do so, and then suffered for it, the backlash against both honest brokers and Palestinians would be immense - 'land for peace' must also bring peace.
If it's me against 48, I feel sorry for the 48.
Similar quotes
All the reputedly powerful reactionaries are merely paper tigers. The reason is that they are divorced from the people. Look! Was not Hitler a paper tiger? Was Hitler not overthrown? U.S. imperialism has not yet been overthrown and it has the atomic bomb. I believe it also will be overthrown. It, too, is a paper tiger.
In every society in human history, including the United States, those in power seek to imbue themselves with the attributes of religion and patriotism as a way of getting greater support for their policy and insulating themselves from any criticism.
Our form of government can no longer be considered an experiment in politics. Crowned with success, it stands forth an example to the world and exhibits the proudest triumph of reason and philosophy.
Gentlemen, comrades, do not be concerned about all you hear about Glasnost and Perestroika and democracy in the coming years. They are primarily for outward consumption. There will be no significant internal changes in the Soviet Union, other than for cosmetic purposes. Our purpose is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep.
Politicians are the same all over. They promise to build bridges even when there are no rivers.
The passions, therefore, not the reason, of the public would sit in judgment. But it is the reason, alone, of the public, that ought to control and regulate the government. The passions ought to be controlled and regulated by the government.