Memory is a code to who we are, a collection of not just dates and facts but also of epic emotional struggles, epiphanies, transformations.
David GrannRead
You want the story to be about something, have some deeper meaning, but there is also an emotional, almost instinctual, element, which is, does this story seize some part of you and compel you to get to the bottom of it?
Interpretation
Stories should possess deeper meanings while also evoking strong emotions and instincts in readers.
David Grann's quote emphasizes the dual nature of storytelling, highlighting the necessity for narratives to engage both the intellect and emotions of the audience. A compelling story should not only convey a deeper message or theme but also resonate on an instinctual level, driving the reader's curiosity and desire to delve further into its essence. This interplay between emotional engagement and intellectual exploration is crucial for a story to be memorable and impactful.
In practice
This quote could be used in a writing workshop to inspire budding authors.
Memory is a code to who we are, a collection of not just dates and facts but also of epic emotional struggles, epiphanies, transformations.
In Brazil, the history of the interaction between blancos and indios - whites and Indians - often reads like an extended epitaph. Tribes were wiped out by disease and massacres; languages and songs were obliterated.
There's a tendency when we write history to do it with the power of hindsight and then assume almost god-like knowledge that nobody living through history has.
I think you get into trouble as an author and a journalist when, rather than owning the gaps, you try to elide them.
Heroes have always served as a reflection of their times, a template of who we are and what we want to be.
The Osage have this lovely phrase: 'Travelers in the Mist.' It was the term for part of an Osage clan that would take the lead whenever the tribe was venturing into unfamiliar realms. And, in a way, we are all travelers in the mist. The challenge is that, as writers, we sometimes want to ignore this murkiness, or we want to write around it.
All art should have a certain mystery and should make demands on the spectator. Giving a sculpture or a drawing too explicit a title takes away part of that mystery so that the spectator moves on to the next object, making no effort to ponder the meaning of what he has just seen. Everyone thinks that he or she looks but they don't really, you know.
I am a creature of my pen. My pen is the best of me.
To get even realer with you for a second, as a black actor, as a performer of color, I don't know how many more roles like Aaron Burr are gonna come along for me.
As a composer at a point where I can absolutely pick and choose what I want to do, I don't want to write about anybody I don't care about.
Is he on his horse? O happy horse, to bear the weight of Antony!
Meeting authors is kind of the death of the characters. That is always heartbreaking.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.