The imposing edifice of science provides a challenging view of what can be achieved by the accumulation of many small efforts in a steady objective and dedicated search for truth.
Charles H. TownesRead
It was strange, in a way, because there were no ideas involved in the laser that weren't already known by somebody 25 years before lasers were discovered. The ideas were all there; just, nobody put it together.
Interpretation
Innovation often arises from combining existing ideas rather than creating entirely new ones.
Charles H. Townes emphasizes that the invention of the laser was not based on revolutionary new concepts, but rather on pre-existing knowledge that remained unconnected until someone brought it all together. This highlights the importance of creativity in innovation, where the true value lies in rearranging known ideas to create something new.
In practice
In a talk about technological advancements, one might reference this quote to illustrate how many inventions are built on previously available knowledge.
The imposing edifice of science provides a challenging view of what can be achieved by the accumulation of many small efforts in a steady objective and dedicated search for truth.
I don't think that science is complete at all. We don't understand everything, and one can see, within science itself, there are many inconsistencies. We just have to accept that we don't understand.
One of the things my family taught me - I think very important in religion and science - is that you must be ready to stand up for what you think. Decide what you really think is best, and stick with it.
I knew I wanted to be a scientist. Which kind of scientist was the question.
The development of science is basically a social phenomenon, dependent on hard work and mutual support of many scientists and on the societies in which they live.
Science has faith. We make postulates. We can't prove those postulates, but we have faith in them.
... many folks take them seriously because they just 'know' that evolution can never be seen in the immediate here and now. In fact, a precisely opposite situation prevails: biologists have documented a veritable glut of cases for rapid and eminently measurable evolution on timescales of years and decades.
Gravitation is, so far, not understandable in terms of other phenomena.
although science could pinpoint the exact spot in the brain that ignites rage, they had yet to identify the location that produces love.
The image of the scientist who puts the pursuit of truth before anything else has been shattered and replaced by a man on the make or a quasi-religious enthusiast who wants to prove his case at any cost. Science is becoming the tool of campaigning warfare, in which truth is the first casualty.
We're going to need a definitive quantum theory of gravity, which is part of a grand unified theory - it's the main missing piece.
What attracted me to immunology was that the whole thing seemed to revolve around a very simple experiment: take two different antibody molecules and compare their primary sequences. The secret of antibody diversity would emerge from that. Fortunately at the time I was sufficiently ignorant of the subject not to realise how naive I was being.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.