Without a global revolution in the sphere of human consciousness a more humane society will not emerge.
Vaclav HavelRead
There's always something suspect about an intellectual on the winning side.
Interpretation
The quote suggests that those who are intellectually dominant in a successful position may be viewed with skepticism.
Vaclav Havel's quote implies that intellectuals or thinkers who support a prevailing ideology or position may lack critical integrity or authenticity. It raises questions about the relationship between power, intellect, and moral responsibility, suggesting that success can breed a form of complacency that undermines genuine critical thought.
In practice
Using this quote during a debate about ethics in leadership.
Without a global revolution in the sphere of human consciousness a more humane society will not emerge.
Ownership is not a vice, not something to be ashamed of, but rather a commitment, and an instrument by which the general good can be served.
In my opinion, theater shouldn't give advice to citizens.
Sometimes I wonder if suicides aren't in fact sad guardians of the meaning of life.
The exercise of power is determined by thousands of interactions between the world of the powerful and that of the powerless, all the more so because these worlds are never divided by a sharp line: everyone has a small part of himself in both.
Human rights, human freedoms... and human dignity have their deepest roots somewhere outside the perceptible world... while the state is a human creation, human beings are the creation of God.
If nations perish, it is not because of their devotion to liberty, but for their disregard of its requirements.
...life is a gift bestowed without anyone asking for it; that the thinking person has a philosophical duty to examine both the nature of life and the conditions it comes with; and that if this person decides to renounce the gift no one asks for, it is the moral and human duty to act on the consequences of that decision.
That a thing is peculiar; is no argument for its being blamable; since the most criminal actions are to a being like man not more unnatural than most of the virtues.
Naturally, it is a terrible, despicable crime when, as in Munich, people are taken hostage, people are killed. But probing the motives of those responsible and showing that they are also individuals with families and have their own story does not excuse what they did.
The chief danger about Paris is that it is such a strong stimulant.
I was devastated when I got the review for my first book. The book came out a couple years before the women's movement broke through, and people were putting it down, asking, 'Why does the woman in this book need to get a divorce? Why can't she just shut up and be happy?'
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.