Any time you get two people in a room who disagree about anything, the time of day, there is a scene to be written. That's what I look for.
The upside of web-based journalism is that everybody gets a chance. The downside is that everybody gets a chance.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Web-based journalism democratizes information sharing but also allows for the spread of inaccuracies.
This quote by Aaron Sorkin highlights the dual nature of web-based journalism, where the accessibility of platforms allows anyone to share their voice and story, which can be empowering. However, this same openness can lead to challenges such as misinformation and a lack of accountability, illustrating the complexities of modern media where everyone has the opportunity to participate, but not everyone adheres to the same standards of truth and professionalism.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a discussion about the impact of social media on news, this quote can illustrate both the positive and negative effects of democratizing information.
More from Aaron Sorkin
All quotes βI'll get cast occasionally as sort of the jerk version of myself, and I have fun doing that. But it's really better for everyone if I stay behind the camera.
Decisions are made by those who show up. Don't ever forget that you're a citizen of this world.
Good writers borrow from other writers. Great writers steal from them outright.
With 'The Social Network,' I got into it at first because frankly I thought there was a cool courtroom drama to be had with the intellectual properties. And then what further drew me in was that the most extraordinary social networking device ever created was created by the world's most antisocial person. I liked that story.
Tell me what you think and then tell me what the really smart person in the room who disagrees with you thinks.
Similar quotes
In technology, we spend so much time experimenting, fine-tuning, getting the absolute cheapest way to do something - so why aren't we doing that with social policy?
A-POC respects that there is a fine balance between the value of the human touch, which can be called artisanal, and the abilities of technology. I like to think of it as poesy and technology.
For technology to be a force for peace and food security, we must widen access to reliable and affordable Internet, accompanied by training in digital literacy and cybersecurity.
An algorithm must be seen to be believed.
But there's so much kludge, so much terrible stuff, we are at the 1908 Hurley washing machine stage with the Internet. That's where we are. We don't get our hair caught in it, but that's the level of primitiveness of where we are. We're in 1908.
Why don't I talk about Big Data? Because I am focused on intelligent answers and not speeds and feeds. It doesn't matter if it is quick if it's the wrong answer.