There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
Noam ChomskyRead
Violence can succeed, as Americans know well from the conquest of the national territory. But at terrible cost. It can also provoke violence in response, and often does.
Interpretation
Violence can achieve immediate results, but it always carries severe consequences and can lead to retaliatory violence.
In this quote, Noam Chomsky reflects on the historical context of violence, particularly in relation to American expansion. He suggests that while violence may achieve short-term goals, such as territorial conquest, it ultimately incurs a heavy toll, not just in human cost but also in creating cycles of violence that can lead to further conflict and retaliation.
In practice
This quote can be used in a debate about the impact of war on society.
There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
While society cannot provide employment for its members, the production/work/income nexus has to be abandoned as a justification for our present parsimony to the unemployed. An assumption cannot be used to justify making second-class citizens of those who are unfortunate enough to constitute living proof of the inaccuracy of that assumption.
Let none admire that riches grow in hell; that soil may best deserve the precious bane.
There are people who think that plunder loses all its immorality as soon as it becomes legal. Personally, I cannot imagine a more alarming situation.
To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker.
When a stupid man is doing something he is ashamed of, he always declares that it is his duty.
No generalization is wholly trueβnot even this one.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.