It's going to be a combination Scopes trial, revolution in the streets, Woodstock Festival and People's Park, all rolled into one.
Abbie HoffmanRead
What if when they called a war, no one went?
Interpretation
The quote questions the nature of war and societal compliance in conflict.
Abbie Hoffman's quote challenges the traditional view of war by suggesting that if people collectively refused to participate, war would lose its power. It highlights the role of individual choice and societal responsibility in the context of conflict, emphasizing the idea that the absence of participation could lead to an end of warfare.
In practice
During a speech at a peace rally.
It's going to be a combination Scopes trial, revolution in the streets, Woodstock Festival and People's Park, all rolled into one.
Peace is a very complicated concept. When the lion gobbles up the lamb and wipes his lips, then there's peace. Well, I ain't for that peace at all.
Every rock or molotov cocktail thrown should make a very obvious political point. Random violence produces random propaganda results. Why waste even a rock?
Revolution is not something fixed in ideology, nor is it something fashioned to a particular decade. It is a perpetual process embedded in the human spirit.
I think the greatest legacy of the 1960s was the general feeling that not only can you fight the powers that be, but you can win.
The idea that media is there to educate us, or to inform us, is ridiculous because that's about tenth or eleventh on their list.
We have heard the rationales offered by the nuclear superpowers. We know who speaks for the nations. But who speaks for the human species? Who speaks for Earth?
The real question is not whether life exists after death. The real question is whether you are alive before death.
In his essay, βPerpetual Peace,β the philosopher, Immanuel Kant, argued that perpetual peace would eventually come to the world in one of two ways, by human insight or by conflicts and catastrophes of a magnitude that left humanity no other choice. We are at such a juncture.
I know [Umbridge] by reputation and I'm sure she's no Death Eater-" "She's foul enough to be one..." "Yes, but the world isn't split into good people and Death Eaters.
I believe in clear-cut positions. I think that the most arrogant position is this apparent, multidisciplinary modesty of "what I am saying now is not unconditional, it is just a hypothesis," and so on. It really is a most arrogant position. I think that the only way to be honest and expose yourself to criticism is to state clearly and dogmatically where you are. You must take the risk and have a position.
A retaliator behaves like a hawk when he is attacked by a hawk, and like a dove when he meets a dove. When he meets another retaliator he plays like a dove. A retaliator is a conditional strategist. His behaviour depends on the behaviour of his opponent.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.