There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
The Washington leadership has put aside non-proliferation programmes and devoted its energies and resources to driving the country to war by extraordinary deceit, then trying to manage the catastrophe it created in Iraq.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote critiques the Washington leadership for prioritizing war over non-proliferation efforts.
Noam Chomsky's quote addresses the actions of Washington leadership, highlighting how instead of focusing on important diplomatic initiatives like non-proliferation of weapons, they have shifted their attention to deceitful strategies aimed at leading the country into war, particularly referencing the consequences of the Iraq War. Chomsky conveys a sense of disillusionment regarding the manipulation of resources and the resulting chaos that ensued from such decisions, emphasizing accountability in political leadership.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a political debate on the consequences of war and leadership decisions.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes →The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
Wherever the Government does not emanate...from the people, the principle of the Government, the esprit de corps, the point of honour, in all those connected with it, and raised by it to privileges above the law and above humanity, will be hatred to the people.
If the Queen can reject the advice of a minister on a little thing like a postage stamp, what would happen if she rejected the advice of the Prime Minister on a major matter? If the Crown personally can reject advice, then, of course, the whole democratic facade turns out to be false
It is our experience that political leaders do not always mean the opposite of what they say.
There is no week, nor day, nor hour, when tyranny may not enter upon this country, if the people lose their supreme confidence in themselves, and lose their roughness and spirit of defiance. Tyranny may always enter—there is no charm or bar against it.
After all, Wall Street is clearly the most powerful lobbying force on Capitol Hill. From 1998 through 2008, the financial sector spent over $5 billion in lobbying and campaign contributions to deregulate Wall Street.
If we don't have an informed electorate we don't have a democracy. So I don't care how people get the information, as long as they get it. I'm just doing it my particular way and I feel lucky I can do it the way I want to do it.