None are so old as those who have outlived enthusiasm.
Henry David ThoreauRead
Whether the flower looks better in the nosegay than in the meadow where it grew and we had to wet our feet to get it! Is the scholastic air any advantage?
Interpretation
The quote reflects on the value of natural beauty versus artificial arrangements.
Henry David Thoreau contrasts the beauty of a flower in its natural meadow with its placement in a bouquet, questioning if the aesthetic of the arrangement is truly superior to the flower's natural environment. This contemplation invites us to consider the intrinsic value of nature and the authenticity that comes from experiencing it directly, rather than through a curated or artificial lens.
In practice
In a speech about environmental conservation, one might quote this to highlight the importance of preserving natural habitats.
None are so old as those who have outlived enthusiasm.
Through want of enterprise and faith men are where they are, buying and selling and spending their lives like servants.
An early-morning walk is a blessing for the whole day.
Have no mean hours, but be grateful for every hour, and accept what it brings. The reality will make any sincere record respectable.
As every season seems best to us in its turn, so the coming in of spring is like the creation of Cosmos out of Chaos and the realization of the Golden Age.
That grand old poem called Winter
He who does not realize to what extent shifting fortune and necessity hold in subjection every human spirit, cannot regard as fellow-creatures nor love as he loves himself those whom chance separated from him by an abyss. The variety of constraints pressing upon man give rise to the illusion of several distinct species that cannot communicate. Only he who has measured the dominion of force, and knows how not to respect it, is capable of love and justice.
A destruction, an annihilation that only man can provoke, only man can prevent.
Despotism has so often been established in the name of liberty that experience should warn us to judge parties by their practices rather than their preachings.
The reason can give nothing at all Like the response to desire.
The trouble with Eichmann was precisely that so many were like him, and that the many were neither perverted nor sadistic, that they were, and still are, terribly and terrifyingly normal. From the viewpoint of our legal institutions and of our moral standards of judgment, this normality was much more terrifying than all the atrocities put together.
Who is more real? Homer or Ulysses? Shakespeare or Hamlet? Burroughs or Tarzan?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.