There is no plausible theory under which the record of the Pentagon Papers can be interpreted as relating to the national defense.
...if you ask me whether or not I'm an atheist, I wouldn't even answer. I would first want an explanation of what it is that I'm supposed not to believe in, and I've never seen an explanation.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Chomsky emphasizes the importance of understanding beliefs before categorizing oneself as a believer or non-believer.
In this quote, Noam Chomsky expresses a critical perspective on the concepts of belief and atheism. He suggests that before one can identify as an atheist, it is essential to have a clear understanding of what that means, indicating that the definition of belief and the object of disbelief should be thoroughly examined. Without a solid explanation of what one is expected to disbelieve, labeling oneself as an atheist is premature and lacks depth.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a philosophy class discussing the nature of belief systems, this quote could prompt deeper questions about atheism.
More from Noam Chomsky
All quotes →The 'free-floating intellectual' may occupy himself with problems because of their inherent interest and importance, perhaps to little effect.
If you're teaching today what you were teaching five years ago, either the field is dead or you are.
There are very few people who are going to look into the mirror and say, 'That person I see is a savage monster;' instead, they make up some construction that justifies what they do.
The Republican Party has become overwhelmingly so extreme that it's hardly a traditional political party anymore.
There is still much debate about whether torture has been effective in eliciting information - the assumption being, apparently, that if it is effective, then it may be justified.
Similar quotes
Are right and wrong convertible terms, dependant upon popular opinion?
I find the whole business of religion profoundly interesting. But it does mystify me that otherwise intelligent people take it seriously.
For axioms in philosophy are not axioms until they are proved upon our pulses.
I mean it as a compliment when I say that you could almost define a philosopher as someone who won't take common sense for an answer.
What is essential, therefore, is not that you no longer believe, but that God continues to believe in you.
I have yet to meet a single person from our culture, no matter what his or her educational background, IQ, and specific training, who had powerful transpersonal experiences and continues to subscribe to the materialistic monism of Western science.