More women than ever are having babies at the peak of their careers. When will we stop punishing them for it?
Interpretation
This quote highlights the struggle women face in balancing career success with motherhood, questioning societal judgments about their choices.
Rebecca Traister's quote points out a significant change in societal norms where more women are choosing to have children during their peak career years. It emphasizes the need to reevaluate the existing biases that often penalize women for pursuing both professional and personal aspirations, advocating for a more supportive environment that acknowledges the complexity of their choices without stigma.
In practice
This quote is perfect for a women's rights seminar discussing the evolving roles of women in society.
There is a kind of woman who is economically powerful, professionally powerful, who threatens a white male grip on power that has a long historic precedent in the country. Independent women living outside of marriage threaten all kinds of things about the way power is supposed to work.
There are all kinds of ways in which women, together, change the world. And I don't mean that in a cheesy way. I'm not somebody who believes all women should support each other. I believe very strongly in women critiquing each other, just not critiquing each other more intensely because they're women.
Plenty of the women who were single in the nineteenth century wrote about their desire to evade marriage. Marriage was scary in a lot of ways. It often involved having a lot of kids, losing your autonomy, being in service to a husband and children who were often born at an unremitting pace without the benefit of modern medicine.
Up until 1920, women couldn't vote. Until 1974, married women couldn't get their own credit cards or, in some cases, their own loans. Basically, the husband's professional, social, and economic identity covered the individual identity of the wife.
Being able to control your reproduction is essential to women's ability to flourish in the United States.
Life changes in the instant. The ordinary instant.
'Middle class' used to be synonymous with secure, with steady, with boring, because middle-class people were people who were pretty much safe from the time they first started work on through retirement and until their deaths. No longer.
The job market of the future will consist of those jobs that robots cannot perform. Our blue-collar work is pattern recognition, making sense of what you see. Gardeners will still have jobs because every garden is different. The same goes for construction workers. The losers are white-collar workers, low-level accountants, brokers, and agents.
When we heard about the hippies, the barely more than boys and girls who decided to try something different ... we laughed at them. We condemned them, our children, for seeking a different future. We hated them for their flowers, for their love, and for their unmistakable rejection of every hideous, mistaken compromise that we had made throughout our hollow, money-bitten, frightened, adult lives
I would like to make sure, first of all, that our women in the informal sector - I mean, these are the farmers and the traders; many of them are not educated, many of them lacking literacy - be able to give them better working conditions. And we've done a lot to be able to achieve that.
There are certainly a lot of things that still need to change when it comes to women in the workforce.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.