The generality of virtuous women are like hidden treasures, they are safe only because nobody has sought after them.
Francois De La RochefoucauldRead
You can find women who have never had an affair, but it is hard to find a woman who has had just one.
Interpretation
The quote suggests that while some women may remain faithful, many have experienced infidelity more than once.
Francois De La Rochefoucauld's quote highlights the complexity of romantic relationships, particularly in relation to infidelity. It implies that while finding women who have been entirely faithful is possible, the reality is that many women have engaged in multiple affairs, reflecting on the nature of desire, temptation, and the challenges of commitment in love.
In practice
This quote can be used in a discussion about modern relationships and fidelity.
The generality of virtuous women are like hidden treasures, they are safe only because nobody has sought after them.
Old men delight in giving good advice as a consolation for the fact that they can no longer set bad examples.
Some counterfeits reproduce so very well the truth that it would be a flaw of judgment not to be deceived by them.
Conceit causes more conversation than wit.
The defects and faults of the mind are like wounds in the body; after all imaginable care has been taken to heal them up, still there will be a scar left behind, and they are in continual danger of breaking the skin and bursting out again.
To understand matters rightly we should understand their details; and as that knowledge is almost infinite, our knowledge is always superficial and imperfect.
Marriage is an adventure, like going to war.
Empathy is the capacity to think and feel oneself into the inner life of another person.
We exist in a culture where trans people are constantly delegitimized.
One theory says that if you treat people well, you're more likely to encourage them to do what you want, making all the effort pay off. Do this, get that. Another one, which I prefer, is that you might consider treating people with kindness merely because you can. _x000D_ _x000D_ Regardless of what they choose to do in response, this is what you choose to do. Because you can.
A house does not need a wife any more than it needs a husband.
Outside of the marriage context, can you think of any other rational basis, reason, for a state using sexual orientation as a factor in denying homosexuals benefits or imposing burdens on them? Is there any other rational decision-making that the government could make? Denying them a job, not granting them benefits of some sort, any other decision?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.