The word constructionism is a mnemonic for two aspects of the theory of science education underlying this project. From constructivist theories of psychology we take a view of learning as a reconstruction rather than as a transmission of knowledge. Then we extend the idea of manipulative materials to the idea that learning is most effective when part of an activity the learner experiences as constructing a meaningful product.
Interpretation
Constructionism emphasizes learning as an active process of creating rather than passively receiving information.
In this quote, Seymour Papert expresses the core principle of constructionism in science education, which is rooted in constructivist theories of learning. He suggests that knowledge is best acquired when learners engage in hands-on activities that they perceive as meaningful construction, thereby reconstructing their understanding through experience rather than merely absorbing information from others. This approach fosters deeper understanding and retention by involving learners actively in the process of creation and discovery.
In practice
In a workshop on innovative teaching methods, this quote can inspire educators to adopt more hands-on learning experiences.
Nothing enrages me more than when people criticize my criticism of school by telling me that schools are not just places to learn maths and spelling, they are places where children learn a vaguely defined thing called socialization...I think schools generally do an effective and terribly damaging job of teaching children to be infantile, dependent, intellectually dishonest, passive and disrespectful to their own developmental capacities.
The scandal of education is that every time you teach something, you deprive a [student] of the pleasure and benefit of discovery.
My basic idea is that programming is the most powerful medium of developing the sophisticated and rigorous thinking needed for mathematics, for grammar, for physics, for statistics, for all the "hard" subjects.... In short, I believe more than ever that programming should be a key part of the intellectual development of people growing up.
Every maker of video games knows something that the makers of curriculum don't seem to understand. You'll never see a video game being advertised as being easy. Kids who do not like school will tell you it's not because it's too hard. It's because it's--boring
A programming language is like a natural, human language in that it favors certain methaphors, images, and ways of thinking.
God forbid that any book should be banned. The practice is as indefensible as infanticide.
Schooling should not be left to the whim or wealth of village elders. I believe that we should fund all schools in the U.S. with our national resources. All these kids are being educated to be Americans, not citizens of Minneapolis or San Francisco.
I read once, which I loved so much, that this great physicist who won a Nobel Prize said that every day when he got home, his dad asked him not what he learned in school but his dad said, 'Did you ask any great questions today?' And I always thought, what a beautiful way to educate kids that we're excited by their questions, not by our answers and whether they can repeat our answers.
Anyone who stops learning is old β whether this happens at twenty or at eighty. Anyone who keeps on learning not only remains young but becomes constantly more valuable β regardless of physical capacity.
Colleges hate geniuses, just as convents hate saints.
A capacity, and taste, for reading, gives access to whatever has already been discovered by others. It is the key, or one of the keys, to the already solved problems. And not only so. It gives a relish, and facility, for successfully pursuing the [yet] unsolved ones.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.