One of the little-celebrated powers of Presidents (and other high government officials) is to listen to their critics with just enough sympathy to ensure their silence.
The accepted ideas of any period are singularly those that serve the dominant economic interest...What economists believe and teach, whether in the United States or in the Soviet Union, is rarely hostile to the institutions - the private business enterprise, the Communist Party - that reflect the dominant economic power. Not to notice this takes effort, although many succeed.
Interpretation
What this quote means
This quote highlights how dominant economic powers shape accepted ideas and beliefs in society, influencing both education and behavior.
John Kenneth Galbraith's quote critiques how the prevailing economic interests of any era tend to shape the ideas and beliefs that gain acceptance in society. He posits that whether in capitalist or communist contexts, the prevailing economic structures—like private enterprises or political parties—tend to align with and promote ideas that support their continued power. Recognizing this influence requires conscious effort, as many people unconsciously adopt these perspectives without question.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
In a lecture on the influence of capitalism on society, I would reference this quote to illustrate how economic power shapes public ideas.
More from John Kenneth Galbraith
All quotes →If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
All successful revolutions are the kicking in of a rotten door.
Money differs from an automobile or mistress in being equally important to those who have it and those who do not.
People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage.
Similar quotes
We ask our companies to restructure; we ask employees to work more for less money because there is overproduction, but then we're unable to defend them from cheaper Chinese imports. We are insane.
The most insidious thing about trickle-down economics is not the claim that if the rich get richer, everyone is better off. It is the claim made by those who oppose any increase in the minimum wage that if the poor get richer, that will be bad for the economy. This is nonsense.
In the world of traditional economics, it shouldn't matter whether you use an opt-in or opt-out system. So long as the costs of registering as a donor or a nondonor are low, the results should be similar. But many findings of behavioral economics show that tiny disparities in such rules can make a big difference.
Economics is a choice between alternatives all the time. Those are the trade-offs.
During the next four years...unless drastic steps are taken by Congress, the U.S. will have nearly 8,000,000 unemployed and will stand on the brink of a deep depression.
At the current $5.15 an hour, the federal minimum wage has become a poverty wage. A full-time worker with one child lives below the official poverty line.