We only have to look at ourselves to see how intelligent life might develop into something we wouldn't want to meet.
I had a bet with Gordon Kane of Michigan University that the Higgs particle wouldn't be found.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Stephen Hawking reflects on his skepticism about the discovery of the Higgs particle, highlighting the unpredictability of scientific outcomes.
In this quote, Stephen Hawking shares his initial doubt regarding the existence of the Higgs particle, which is a fundamental component of particle physics. His wager with Gordon Kane emphasizes the tension between scientific prediction and discovery, illustrating how even renowned scientists can be surprised by the findings of experimental research. This statement also reveals the nature of scientific inquiry, where hypotheses are tested against real-world evidence, and outcomes can often defy expectations.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
During a scientific conference, to illustrate the unpredictability of research outcomes.
More from Stephen Hawking
All quotes βI regard the brain as a computer which will stop working when its components fail. There is no heaven or afterlife for broken down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark.
It surprises me how disinterested we are today about things like physics, space, the universe and philosophy of our existence, our purpose, our final destination. Its a crazy world out there. Be curious.
I was not a good student. I did not spend much time at college; I was too busy enjoying myself.
The world has changed far more in the past 100 years than in any other century in history. The reason is not political or economic but technological-technologies that flowed directly from advances in basic science. Clearly, no scientist better represents those advances than Albert Einstein: TIME's Person of the Century.
In my opinion, there is no aspect of reality beyond the reach of the human mind.
Similar quotes
ZOOLOGY, n. The science and history of the animal kingdom, including its king, the House Fly ("Musca maledicta"). The father of Zoology was Aristotle, as is universally conceded, but the name of its mother has not come down to us.
Every action has an equal and opposite reaction
The observation that species are amazingly conservative and static entities throughout long periods of time has all the qualities of the emperor's new clothes: everyone knew it but preferred to ignore it. Paleontologists, faced with a recalcitrant record obstinately refusing to yield Darwin's predicted pattern, simply looked the other way.
There cannot be a language more universal and more simple, more free from errors and obscurities...more worthy to express the invariable relations of all natural things [than mathematics]. [It interprets] all phenomena by the same language, as if to attest the unity and simplicity of the plan of the universe, and to make still more evident that unchangeable order which presides over all natural causes
If everything in chemistry is explained in a satisfactory manner without the help of phlogiston, it is by that reason alone infinitely probable that the principle does not exist; that it is a hypothetical body, a gratuitous supposition; indeed, it is in the principles of good logic, not to multiply bodies without necessity.
We cannot even predict what kinds of emergent properties would appear when animals begin interacting as part of a brain-net. In theory, you could imagine that a combination of brains could provide solutions that individual brains cannot achieve by themselves.