That which is not measurable is not science. That which is not physics is stamp collecting.
Ernest RutherfordRead
The energy produced by the breaking down of the atom is a very poor kind of thing. Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.
Interpretation
Rutherford critiques the idea that nuclear energy can be a viable power source, suggesting it is unrealistic.
In this quote, Ernest Rutherford expresses skepticism about the potential of atomic energy as a feasible power source, describing it as 'moonshine'—a term implying that the ideas surrounding the transformation of atoms into energy are fanciful and impractical. He indicates that while nuclear reactions are scientifically fascinating, the application of this energy for practical power generation is misguided and not grounded in reality.
In practice
In a debate about renewable resources, one might reference Rutherford's skepticism about nuclear energy.
That which is not measurable is not science. That which is not physics is stamp collecting.
I am a great believer in the simplicity of things and as you probably know I am inclined to hang on to broad & simple ideas like grim death until evidence is too strong for my tenacity.
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.
Now I know what the atom looks like.
If your result needs a statistician then you should design a better experiment.
Should a young scientist working with me come to me after two years of such work and ask me what to do next, I would advise him to get out of science. After two years of work, if a man does not know what to do next, he will never make a real scientist.
If you just have a single problem to solve, then fine, go ahead and use a neural network. But if you want to do science and understand how to choose architectures, or how to go to a new problem, you have to understand what different architectures can and cannot do.
Even though I knew pretty early that I was going to be a scientist, it wasn't the science that interested me in science fiction; it was the vision of future societies that, for better or worse, would be radically different from our own.
At the simplest level, economics can better show us the consequences of our actions. Less simple are cases in which we don't have the knowledge to predict the full consequences. Global warming and climate change are examples.
You will certainly not doubt the necessity of studying astronomy and physics, if you are desirous of comprehending the relation between the world and Providence as it is in reality, and not according to imagination.
Cancer's life is a recapitulation of the body's life, its existence a pathological mirror of our own. Susan Sontag warned against overburdening an illness with metaphors. But this is not a metaphor. Down to their innate molecular core, cancer cells are hyperactive, survival-endowed, scrappy, fecund, inventive copies of ourselves.
We can invent as many theories we like, and any one of them can be made to fit the facts. But that theory is always preferred which makes the fewest number of assumptions.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.