That which is not measurable is not science. That which is not physics is stamp collecting.
Ernest RutherfordRead
If your result needs a statistician then you should design a better experiment.
Interpretation
The quote emphasizes the importance of good experimental design over reliance on statistical analysis.
Ernest Rutherford suggests that if the results of an experiment depend heavily on a statistician's expertise to interpret or validate them, it indicates that the experiment's design itself may be flawed. This underscores the value of creating robust, well-structured experiments that can yield clear and reliable results without needing excessive statistical manipulation.
In practice
In a scientific seminar discussing experimental methods, you might quote this to advocate for strong design principles.
That which is not measurable is not science. That which is not physics is stamp collecting.
The energy produced by the breaking down of the atom is a very poor kind of thing. Anyone who expects a source of power from the transformation of these atoms is talking moonshine.
I am a great believer in the simplicity of things and as you probably know I am inclined to hang on to broad & simple ideas like grim death until evidence is too strong for my tenacity.
All science is either physics or stamp collecting.
Now I know what the atom looks like.
Should a young scientist working with me come to me after two years of such work and ask me what to do next, I would advise him to get out of science. After two years of work, if a man does not know what to do next, he will never make a real scientist.
Scientific discovery may not be better than sex, but the satisfaction lasts longer.
The word 'universe' is obviously not intended to have a plural, but science has evolved in such a way that we need a plural noun for something similar to what we ordinarily call our universe.
There is no science in this world like physics. Nothing comes close to the precision with which physics enables you to understand the world around you. It's the laws of physics that allow us to say exactly what time the sun is going to rise. What time the eclipse is going to begin. What time the eclipse is going to end.
In a small lab, if you make a mistake, you can go in the next day and fix it. But here, when you are committed to spending a hundred thousand or a million dollars, you can't fix it later. You need to have a system of checks and balances internally. In particle physics, that's just part of the structure.
They [scientists of centuries past] call on God only from the lonely and precarious edge of incomprehension. Where they feel certain about their explanations, however, God gets hardly a mention.
People who look for the first time through a microscope say, 'Now I see this, and then I see that,' and even a skilled observer can be fooled. On these observations I have spent more time than many will believe, but I have done them with joy, and I have taken no notice of those who have said, 'Why take so much trouble,' and, 'What good is it?'
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.