Although we work through financial markets, our goal is to help Main Street, not Wall Street.
Janet YellenRead
After adjusting for inflation, the average income of the top 5% of households grew by 38% from 1989 to 2013. Β By comparison, the average real income of the other 95% of households grew less than 10%.
Interpretation
The wealth gap between the top 5% and the rest of the population has significantly increased over a few decades.
This quote by Janet Yellen highlights the growing disparity in income growth between the top 5% of households and the remaining 95% from 1989 to 2013. It underscores the widening economic inequality in society, as the wealthy have seen their incomes rise substantially, while the majority have experienced negligible growth in their earnings.
In practice
During a speech on economic policy, one could use this quote to illustrate the challenges of income inequality.
Although we work through financial markets, our goal is to help Main Street, not Wall Street.
We need to keep in mind the well-established fact that the full effects of monetary policy are felt only after long lags. This means that policy makers cannot wait until they have achieved their objectives to begin adjusting policy.
A clear lesson of history is that a 'sine qua non' for sustained economic recovery following a financial crisis is a thoroughgoing repair of the financial system.
Transparency concerning the Federal Reserve's conduct of monetary policy is desirable because better public understanding enhances the effectiveness of policy. More important, however, is that transparent communications reflect the Federal Reserve's commitment to accountability within our democratic system of government.
For decades, the pace of technological change in manufacturing has outstripped that in the economy as a whole. And, so, firms - manufacturing firms - have found it easier to continue producing by - with - reducing their workforces.
Inequality has risen to the point that it seems to me worthwhile for the U.S. to seriously consider taking the risk of making our economy more rewarding for more of the people.
Markets can influence the events that they anticipate.
Yes, over the centuries economic progress has reduced some gross disparities - modern Americans are relatively unlikely to simply starve to death (though it can happen), so in that sense the gap between rich and poor has narrowed. But the question isn't whether society is, in some sense, more equal than it was in 1900. It's whether it is radically more unequal than it was in 1970. And of course it is.
A nation's economy is more than its markets, tastes, technologies and property rights.
China's government has far more control over the country's economy than our government has over ours, and it is moving from export dependence to a model of growth driven by domestic demand. Any restriction on exports to the U.S. would simply accelerate a process already underway.
Landlords grow rich in their sleep without working, risking or economising
The Middle East has the highest unemployment percentage of any region in the world we have the largest youth cohort of history coming into the market place that frustration does translate into the political sphere when people are hungry and without jobs.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.