How we put our collective talents to work is a social issue, not solely a personal one.
Clay ShirkyRead
What I think is coming instead are much more organic ways of organizing information than our current categorization schemes allow, based on two units - the link, which can point to anything, and the tag, which is a way of attaching labels to links. The strategy of tagging - free-form labeling, without regard to categorical constraints - seems like a recipe for disaster, but as the Web has shown us, you can extract a surprising amount of value from big messy data sets.
Interpretation
The quote discusses the evolution of information organization through organic methods like tagging, emphasizing the value found in messy data sets.
In this quote, Clay Shirky reflects on the future of organizing information, moving away from rigid categorization to a more fluid and organic method centered around links and tags. He suggests that while free-form tagging may seem chaotic and prone to failure, it has the potential to uncover valuable insights from complex data, as demonstrated by the workings of the Web, which thrives on the richness and unpredictability of user-generated content.
In practice
In a tech conference discussing the future of data management.
How we put our collective talents to work is a social issue, not solely a personal one.
Curation comes up when people realize that it isn’t just about information seeking, it’s also about synchronizing a community.
It is our misfortune, as a historical generation, to live through the largest expansion in expressive capability in human history, a misfortune because abundance breaks more things than scarcity.
It is possible to think that the Internet will be a net positive for society while admitting that there are significant downsides - after all, it's not a revolution if nobody loses.
Wikipedia took the idea of peer review and applied it to volunteers on a global scale, becoming the most important English reference work in less than 10 years. Yet the cumulative time devoted to creating Wikipedia, something like 100 million hours of human thought, is expended by Americans every weekend, just watching ads.
If someone around you is multitasking, you pick up distraction like second-hand smoke.
I think long-term, Bitcoin is a currency of the Internet. So, even if humans don't use it, routers will use it. Web browsers will use it. Web servers will use it.
Program testing can be used to show the presence of bugs, but never to show their absence!
When I was trying to popularize the concept of the Internet - ten or 15 years ago - I came up with this concept of "the 5 Cs." Services needed to have content, context, community, commerce, and connectivity. After that, when I was trying to think of what the key management principles were to build into the culture, I started talking about the Ps. The P's were things like passion, perseverance, perspective and people. I think the people aspect is really the most important one.
You look at marketing: everything that's happening in marketing is digitized. Everything that's happening in finance is digitized. So pretty much every industry, every function in every industry, has a huge element that's driven by information technology. It's no longer discrete.
Few industries have the ability to transform society like tech, yet too few companies are asking the questions or working on the problems that would create meaningful social change.
We humans are not the end of evolution, so if we can make a machine that's as smart as a person, we can probably also make one that's much smarter. There's no point in making just another person. You want to make one that can do things we can't.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.