How we put our collective talents to work is a social issue, not solely a personal one.
Wikipedia took the idea of peer review and applied it to volunteers on a global scale, becoming the most important English reference work in less than 10 years. Yet the cumulative time devoted to creating Wikipedia, something like 100 million hours of human thought, is expended by Americans every weekend, just watching ads.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Wikipedia demonstrates the power of collective effort and contribution, contrasting it with how much time is wasted on advertisements.
This quote by Clay Shirky highlights the remarkable achievement of Wikipedia, which harnessed global volunteer efforts to create one of the most significant reference works in a short period. It emphasizes the contrast between productive collective tasks, like building Wikipedia, and the vast amounts of time people spend on less meaningful activities such as watching advertisements, provoking reflection on how we value our time and contributions.
Themes
In practice
Example use cases
This quote can be used in a presentation about the value of volunteering and collective efforts in modern technology.
More from Clay Shirky
All quotes →Curation comes up when people realize that it isn’t just about information seeking, it’s also about synchronizing a community.
It is our misfortune, as a historical generation, to live through the largest expansion in expressive capability in human history, a misfortune because abundance breaks more things than scarcity.
What I think is coming instead are much more organic ways of organizing information than our current categorization schemes allow, based on two units - the link, which can point to anything, and the tag, which is a way of attaching labels to links. The strategy of tagging - free-form labeling, without regard to categorical constraints - seems like a recipe for disaster, but as the Web has shown us, you can extract a surprising amount of value from big messy data sets.
It is possible to think that the Internet will be a net positive for society while admitting that there are significant downsides - after all, it's not a revolution if nobody loses.
If someone around you is multitasking, you pick up distraction like second-hand smoke.
Similar quotes
Because primarily of the power of the Internet, people of modest means can band together and amass vast sums of money that can change the world for some public good if they all agree.
What makes the IoT a disruptive technology in the way we organize economic life is that it helps humanity reintegrate itself into the complex choreography of the biosphere, and by doing so, dramatically increases productivity without compromising the ecological relationships that govern the planet.
Green technologies - going green - is bigger than the Internet. It could be the biggest economic opportunity of the 21st century.
Every three weeks, we bring online as much solar power as we did in all of 2008.
EMACS could not have been reached by a process of careful design, because such processes arrive only at goals which are visible at the outset, and whose desirability is established on the bottom line at the outset. Neither I nor anyone else visualized an extensible editor until I had made one, nor appreciated its value until he had experienced it. EMACS exists because I felt free to make individually useful small improvements on a path whose end was not in sight.
It is doubling now every two years. Doubling every two years means multiplying by 1,000 in 20 years. At that rate we'll meet 100 percent of our energy needs in 20 years.