No principle is worth the sacrifice of a single human being.
Daniel BerriganRead
Instead of building the peace by attacking injustices like starvation, disease, illiteracy, political and economic servitude, we spend a trillion dollars on war since 1946, until hatred and conflict have become the international preoccupation.
Interpretation
The quote highlights the misguided priorities of spending on war instead of addressing global injustices.
Daniel Berrigan emphasizes the irony in our global priorities, where instead of investing in solutions to pressing issues like starvation, disease, and illiteracy, significant resources have been funneled into warfare. This misallocation not only perpetuates suffering but also cultivates a world steeped in hatred and conflict, diverting our focus from creating a peaceful and just society.
In practice
This quote could be used at a peace rally to emphasize the need for prioritizing humanitarian efforts over military spending.
No principle is worth the sacrifice of a single human being.
Of course, let us have peace, we cry, "but at the same time let us have normalcy, let us lose nothing, let our lives stand intact, let us know neither prison nor ill repute nor disruption of ties ... " There is no peace because there are no peacemakers. There are no makers of peace because the making of peace is at least as costly as the making of war - at least as exigent, at least as disruptive, at least as liable to bring disgrace and prison, and death in its wake.
The death of a single human being is too heavy a price for the vindication of any principle, however sacred.
The God of life summons us to life; more, to be lifegivers, especially toward those who lie under the heel of the powers.
For my part, I believe that the vain, glorious and the violent will not inherit the earth. . . . In pursuance of that faith my friends and I take the hands of the dying in our hands. And some of us travel to the Pentagon, and others live in the Bowery and serve there, and others speak unpopularly and plainly of the fate of the unborn and of convicted criminals. It is all one.
Sometime in your life, hope that you might see one starved man, the look on his face when the bread finally arrives. Hope that you might have baked it or bought or even kneaded it yourself. For that look on his face, for your meeting his eyes across a piece of bread, you might be willing to lose a lot, or suffer a lot, or die a little, even.
Peaceful coexistence cannot be limited to the powerful countries if we want to ensure world peace.
It is not given to us to peer into the mysteries of the future. Still, I avow my hope and faith, sure and inviolate, that in the days to come the British and American peoples will for their own safety and for the good of all walk together side by side in majesty, in justice, and in peace.
If you want to bring an end to long-standing conflict, you have to be prepared to compromise.
In my view of the present aspect of affairs, there is no need of bloodshed and war. There is no necessity for it. I am not in favor of such a course, and I may say in advance, there will be no blood shed unless it be forced upon the government. The government will not use force unless force is used against it.
Israel is no longer a people that dwells alone, and has to join the global journey toward peace, reconciliation and international cooperation.
Without peace and without the overwhelming majority of people that believe in peace defending it, working for it, believing in it, security can never really be a reality.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.