The ambivalence of writing is such that it can be considered both an act and an interpretive process that follows after an act with which it cannot coincide. As such, it both affirms and denies its own nature.
Paul De ManRead
Literature exists at the same time in the modes of error and truth; it both betrays and obeys its own mode of being.
Interpretation
What this quote means
Literature reflects both reality and fiction, revealing deeper truths through artistic expression.
In this quote, Paul De Man suggests that literature embodies a dual existence, simultaneously presenting both errors and truths. It acts as a mirror to human experience, capturing the complexities of existence. By navigating through narratives that may be misleading or inaccurate, literature ultimately serves to illuminate profound truths about life, humanity, and the world we inhabit.
Themes
LiteratureTruthErrorExpressionHumanity
In practice
Example use cases
In a book club discussion, one might use this quote to illustrate the complexity of interpreting literary themes.
More from Paul De Man
All quotes βCuriously enough, it seems to be only in describing a mode of language which does not mean what it says that one can actually say what one means.
Paul De ManRead
Similar quotes
That's why we read fiction, isn't it? To remind us that whatever we suffer, we're not the only ones?
Jodi PicoultRead
Of course there are big differences in length and character and vocabulary, but each level has its particular pleasures when it comes to the words one can use and the way one uses them.
Margaret MahyRead
He was the man who of all modern, and perhaps ancient poets, had the largest and most comprehensive soul. . . . He was naturally learn'd; he needed not the spectacles of books to read Nature; he looked inwards, and found her there. . . . He is many times flat, insipid; his comic wit degenerating in to clenches, his serious swelling into bombast. But he is always great, when some occasion is presented to him.
John DrydenRead
A good novel tells us the truth about its hero; but a bad novel tells us the truth about its author.
Gilbert K. ChestertonRead
I emphasize the distinction between brackets and no brackets because it will affect your reading experience, if you will allow it. Brackets are exciting. Even though you are approaching Sappho in translation, that is no reason you should miss the drama of trying to read a papyrus torn in half or riddled with holes or smaller than a postage stamp--brackets imply a free space of imaginal adventure.
Anne CarsonRead
Most crime fiction, no matter how 'hard-boiled' or bloodily forensic, is essentially sentimental, for most crime writers are disappointed romantics.
John BanvilleRead