Christianity remains to this day the greatest misfortune of humanity.
Friedrich NietzscheRead
Is man one of God's blunders? Or is God one of man's blunders?
Interpretation
The quote questions the nature and existence of both humanity and divinity, suggesting a critique of creation itself.
Friedrich Nietzsche's quote explores the contrasting notions of humanity and divinity, provoking thought about the imperfections of both. By questioning whether humans are a mistake made by God or whether God is a mistake concocted by humans, Nietzsche challenges traditional beliefs and encourages a deeper reflection on the relationship between mankind and the divine.
In practice
This quote can be used in a philosophical debate about the nature of existence and divinity.
Christianity remains to this day the greatest misfortune of humanity.
That which does not kill us makes us stronger.
Hope in reality is the worst of all evils because it prolongs the torments of man.
Watch them clamber, these swift monkeys! They clamber over one another and thus drag one another into the mud and the depth. They all want to get to the throne: that is their madness β as if happiness sat on the throne. Often, mud sits on the throne β and often the throne also on mud. Mad they all appear to me, clambering monkeys and overardent. Foul smells their idol, the cold monster: foul, they smell to me altogether, these idolators.
Reason is the cause of our falsification of the evidence of the senses. In so far as the senses show becoming, passing away, change, they do not lie.
The anarchist and the Christian have a common origin.
Shh! Listen! Someoneβs coming! I think β I think it might be us!
When we believe that we should be satisfied rather than God glorified in our worship, then we put God below ourselves as though He had been made for us rather than that we had been made for Him.
To those peoples in the huts and villages of half the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required - not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.
I saw that publishing all over the world was deeply constrained by self-censorship, economics and political censorship, while the military-industrial complex was growing at a tremendous rate, and the amount of information that it was collecting about all of us vastly exceeded the public imagination.
Privilege (to the privileged) means having private laws.
Besides, do any of us understand what we are doing? If we did, would we ever do it?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.