How many times have we seen reality celebrities fall from grace - often through no fault of their own - and then go on a show like 'Celebrity Big Brother' and say, 'I want to show the public a different side of me.' And I'm screaming at the telly going, 'This is not therapy. This is voyeurism!'
Interpretation
Reality TV often exploits individuals for entertainment, rather than providing genuine healing or insight.
In this quote, Ricky Gervais critiques the phenomenon where reality celebrities, after experiencing public downfall, attempt to reshape their image through platforms like 'Celebrity Big Brother'. He points out the difference between seeking genuine therapy and the superficiality of reality TV, which he views as a form of voyeurism rather than a therapeutic journey. Gervais emphasizes that such platforms do not offer real help; instead, they merely invite audiences to consume personal struggles for entertainment.
In practice
This quote can be used in a discussion about the ethics of reality television.
You should make something. You should bring something into the world that wasn't in the world before. It doesn't matter what it is. It doesn't matter if it's a table or a film or gardening-everyone should create. You should do something, then sit back and say, 'I did that.'
It's better to create something that others criticise than to create nothing and criticise others. Go create, have fun!!
Science seeks the truth. And it does not discriminate. For better or worse it finds things out. Science is humble. It knows what it knows and it knows what it doesn’t know. It bases its conclusions and beliefs on hard evidence -- evidence that is constantly updated and upgraded. It doesn’t get offended when new facts come along. It embraces the body of knowledge. It doesn’t hold on to medieval practices because they are tradition.
I used to believe in God. The Christian one, that is (There are a few thousand to choose from. But I was born in a country where the dominant religion was Christianity so I believed in that one. Isn't it weird how that always happens?). Luckily I was also interested in science and nature. And reason and logic. And honesty and truth. And equality and fairness. By the age of eight I was an atheist.
People now live their lives like an open wound to be famous - they do bad things because they're rewarded for it.
A Christian telling an atheist they're going to hell is as scary as a child telling an adult they're not getting any presents from Santa.
Instead of gambling on the eternal impossibility of the revolution and on the fascist return of a war-machine in general, why not think that a new type of revolution is in the course of becoming possible, and that all kinds of mutating, living machines conduct wars, are combined and trace out a plane of consistance which undermines the plane of organization of the World and the States?
You mean am I for it or against it? You think this is a key question I'm going to be asked on Vega, and you want to make sure I give the right answer? Okay. Overpopulation is why I'm in favor of homosexuality and a celibate clergy. A celibate clergy is an especially good idea, because it tends to suppress any hereditary propensity toward fanaticism.
Real freedom lies in wildness, not in civilization.
They don't want equal time - they want all the time there is.
The attack on "selfishness" is an attack on man's self-esteem; to surrender one, is to surrender the other.
He who is mistaken in an action which he sincerely believes to be right may be an enemy, but retains our esteem.
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.