Of what use is a philosopher who doesn't hurt anybody's feelings?
DiogenesRead
Most men are within a finger's breadth of being mad.
Interpretation
This quote suggests that the line between sanity and madness is very thin.
Diogenes' assertion reflects a profound insight into human nature, suggesting that the distinction between sanity and madness is precariously narrow. It invites contemplation on the fragility of the human mind, encouraging individuals to recognize the fine line that separates rational behavior from irrationality, and may prompt a deeper exploration of what constitutes normalcy in our thoughts and actions.
In practice
In a philosophical discussion about human behavior.
Of what use is a philosopher who doesn't hurt anybody's feelings?
The art of being a slave is to rule one's master.
As a matter of self-preservation, a man needs good friends or ardent enemies, for the former instruct him and the latter take him to task.
I am not an Athenian or a Greek, but a citizen of the world.
We come into the world alone and we die alone. Why, in life, should we be any less alone?
All things are in common among friends.
This revelation of the secrets of nature, long mercifully withheld from man, should arouse the most solemn reflections in the mind and conscience of every human being capable of comprehension. We must indeed pray that these awful agencies will be made to conduce to peace among the nations, and that instead of wreaking measureless havoc upon the entire globe, may become a perennial fountain of world prosperity.
Compared to the unleashed forces of warfare and of faith, Mount Vesuvius was kinder to the legacy of antiquity.
I am unable to think of any critical, complex human activity that could be safely reduced to a simple summary equation.
And he began to see the truth, that Ged had neither lost nor won but, naming the shadow of his death with his own name, had made himself whole: a man who, knowing his whole true self, cannot be used or possessed by any power other than himself, and whose life therefore is lived for life's sake and never in the service of ruin, or pain, or hatred, or the dark.
I have spent a lot of my career working on normative political philosophy, developing the 'capabilities approach' to social justice. I have also spent a lot of my career working on the structure of the emotions, and their role in human life.
Is there not a sort of remorse that precedes sin? Was it remorse at the very fact that I existed?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.