I'm not easily scared; from the age of 8, I learned what it means to have everything you know taken away and what it means to persevere. I approach politics the same way.
Ilhan OmarRead
Here in Minnesota, we don't only welcome immigrants; we send them to Washington.
Interpretation
Minnesota embraces immigrants and even elevates them to national positions of influence.
Ilhan Omar emphasizes Minnesota's progressive attitude towards immigrants, indicating that the state not only accepts them but also empowers them to take significant roles in politics, including representation in Washington. This highlights a commitment to diversity and inclusion, showcasing how immigrants can shape and contribute to the political landscape.
In practice
This quote can be used during a political rally to advocate for immigrant rights.
I'm not easily scared; from the age of 8, I learned what it means to have everything you know taken away and what it means to persevere. I approach politics the same way.
We know that when people are civically engaged, when they understand what their rights are, when they understand that in a democracy you can challenge governments, you can challenge policymakers, and you can... actually shape and form future policy, I think it changes the perception that a lot of young people have about where power is.
Today we voted as Democrats and Republicans. Tomorrow we begin again as New Yorkers.
In primary school in south-eastern Nigeria, I was taught that Hosni Mubarak was the president of Egypt. I learned the same thing in secondary school. In university, Mubarak was still president of Egypt. I came to assume, subconsciously, that he - and others like Paul Biya in Cameroon and Muammar Gaddafi in Libya - would never leave.
The abortion cases produced an enormous amount of mail to my chambers, vastly more than to the other chambers, I am sure. I sometimes thought there wasn't a woman in the United States who didn't write me a letter on one side or the other of that issue.
The true principle of a republic is that the people should choose whom they please to govern them. Representation is imperfect, in proportion as the current of popular favor is checked. The great source of free government, popular election, should be perfectly pure, and the most unbounded liberty allowed.
Bad officials are the ones elected by good citizens who do not vote.
What, after all, is the public under present conditions? What are the reasons for its eclipse? What hinders it from finding and identifying itself? By what means shall its inchoate and amorphous estate be organized into effective political action relevant to present social needs and opportunities? What has happened to the public in the century and a half since the theory of political democracy was urged with such assurance and hope?
Subscribe for the occasional hand-picked quote. No noise.